Jump to content

Unbiased Perspective: The war in Iraq


Hyperlite

Recommended Posts

Is there a difference between sending troops to Iraq instead of Sudan?? Or Sudan instead of Iraq??

The similarity is that in both cases a significant proportion of the population were being persecuted' date=' and intervention was made difficult by certain other foreign countries having a vested interest in maintaining the [i']status quo[/i]. The difference is that Sudan has a smidegeon of oil, Iraq is overflowing with it.

It is my belief that the primary reason for invading Iraq was not to locate and destroy non-existent WMD, nor to rescue a people from a vile dictatorship, but to secure ME oil supplies. (Incompetent way of doing it, but that's just another opinion.) Sudan stands little chance of being rescued from itself by the West because they just don't have enough oil to deserve rescue.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.