Which Way Information?

[bryanherman]

I think there is a confusion about causuality and correlation when it comes to whichway info. I cant beleive that in the 21 century there are people who beleive that the wave function collapses BECAUSE which way information was obtained as if the particles knew or cared about what we were doing. Instead there is a coincidental correlation that any physical measurment of any kind that reavels ww coincidentally collapses the wave function, not BECAUSE we obtain ww but because of the physical limitations of our universe.There is a mechanical interpretaion of Quantum physics and a magical one, no in-between (you can argue that we dont know everything about quantum physics probablley) but that dosent make it magic, I dont know why people like to interpret quantum procesess as magical (Uncertianty principle).

Arguing that collapsing an entangled particle without affecting the particle is bullox, the particles are entangled you still had to collapse the first entangled particle to collapse the second one even though you are techiniclly not touching the second one, however the logic follows that they are entangled so affecting one particle will alter the other one this does not prove that particles react diffrently (collapse) only to observer interactions than to (collapse) any other non-observer physical interactions.IE there are no observers in quantum cosmology.

 

http://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0612163

 

http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/arxiv/pdf/...102.5709v1.pdf

 

http://web.mit.edu/r...dv/Xafshar.html