Star of Bethlehem really pointed from Babylon to Jerusalem

[swansont]

Statist!? I wasn't aware that SFN was an independent nation now. I assume Cap'n is El Presidente.

 

(Cough) Puppet (Cough)

[superball]

Modern day dipole. deifying scientific factor

similarity leads to discovery..

[mooeypoo]

And the source of this remarkable animation is....?

 

How is it defying scientific factor? And how is it remotely related to the discussion at hand?

[Phi for All]

How is it defying scientific factor? And how is it remotely related to the discussion at hand?

He said "deifying" scientific factor, not defying. I think he's saying that he's God's new antenna.

[superball]

 

mooeypoo said keep this scientific

 

 

 

keep this scientific please. the relation is self evident.

 

sincerely super ball. ok i will link you to wiki.

wiki

My link follow cassimir effect. it has been determined that was so

This only describing a dipole, we know what that is? a north and south bar magnet.

the animation is the energy describes as represented.

The poynting energy have been comprised, and also compared. relative.

The scientific principles, are self verified, factors are also included.

 

Don't assume this to be true, but scientific data claims this is so?

 

He said "deifying" scientific factor, Clues, in the realm of particles.

self evident. irrelevant, You need logic defines intelligence.

Edited November 27, 2011 by superball

[mooeypoo]

mooeypoo said keep this scientific

Oh superball, superball. We're trying. Hard, so hard.

 

keep this scientific please. the relation is self evident.

It isn't self evident or I wouldn't have asked. And the person who's not being sicentific is you.

 

I'm not asking you , I'm telling you, and your attitude is only going to get you out of this forum, permanently, especially seeing as you are arguing your OWN weird ideas on *OTHER PEOPLE'S THREADS*.

 

You are the one who is taking the threads on different directions. You better stop, and you better stop quickly. The moderators are starting to lose patience.

 

 

sincerely super ball. ok i will link you to wiki.

wiki

My link follow cassimir effect. it has been determined that was so

This only describing a dipole, we know what that is? a north and south bar magnet.

the animation is the energy describes as represented.

The poynting energy have been comprised, and also compared. relative.

The scientific principles, are self verified, factors are also included.

 

Don't assume this to be true, but scientific data claims this is so?

Yes, I know what a dipole is. What I don't understand (and asked you directly) is how it is related to the debate at hand about the Star of Bethlehem pointing from Babylon to Jerusalem.

 

What does the dipole have to do with it?

 

He said "deifying" scientific factor, Clues, in the realm of particles.

self evident. irrelevant, You need logic defines intelligence.

 

That above sentence is so unclear I don't even know what you mean.

[superball]

Ok you win. cheers... Mooipoo (self evident), In terms of reletivity. (relitive to observer) I hope this is much clearer.

 

Here is a link i had made clear. This is describing something that is certain.

 

 

Dipole is a poynting, energy. we must act like intelligent human beings. << that much is clear.

wikihttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poynting_vector

Edited November 27, 2011 by superball

[Phi for All]

He said "deifying" scientific factor, Clues, in the realm of particles.

self evident. irrelevant, You need logic defines intelligence.

Dude, when was the last time you slept? This is the kind of thing one says that makes perfect sense after being up for several days, but no one else has the least idea where you're coming from.

[mooeypoo]

Ok you win. cheers... Mooipoo (self evident), In terms of reletivity. (relitive to observer) I hope this is much clearer.

 

Here is a link i had made clear. This is describing something that is certain.

 

Dipole is a poynting, energy. we must act like intelligent human beings. << that much is clear.

wikihttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poynting_vector

 

I know what Poynting vector is, I actually spent quite a very long time using it in calculations. I know what dipole is. How does it relate to the star of bethlehem -- you are not answering this question at all by explaining again what dipole is. "Relativity" is another physical subject and now you need to explain how, in the name of all that is sane, is THAT related to the topic at hand?

 

You are making zero sense, and your explanations are making even less sense the more you try. Take a break, sit back, think about our questions and come back with relevant answers. Adding more and more physical concepts do not make you sound more knowledgeable - they just make no sense in the context.

 

~mooey

 

 

P.S, simply put (and ignoring some more complicated etymology), my nickname means 'bullshit' so I do agree that in this discussion it is self evident. Not quite sure how it's relative to relativity, though, unless you're the frame of reference, and I'm the observer.