Steve Christopher Posted December 17, 2011 Share Posted December 17, 2011 Hi, I'm new here but I wanted to show you people how the true nature of the universe is actually a tiny, inverted one. Cyrus Teed's foundational premise that the Earth's surface is concave and all the planets, sun, moon and stars are actually very small in relation to it and fit inside a hollow, inverted Earth has never been debunked. In addition to his theory I want to point out the optical illusory effects of the glass ceiling about 70 miles high that plays tricks on the eye and causes one to perceive the sun and moon as spherical but are actually not. Her are some videos from m y webpage I made concerning the subject at hand. Here's my webpage that consolidates my explanation.... http://www.missterib...icepiphany.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Cuthber Posted December 17, 2011 Share Posted December 17, 2011 LOL At best this needs to me moved to "Speculations". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
michel123456 Posted December 17, 2011 Share Posted December 17, 2011 http://www.lhup.edu/~dsimanek/hollow/morrow.htm Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Klaynos Posted December 17, 2011 Share Posted December 17, 2011 ! Moderator Note Moving to speculations This is debunked by long range travel, satellites, and of course photos taken from space craft....http://www.wallpaperweb.org/wallpaper/space/1024x768/Earth_Rise_Apollo_8_December_1968_1024x768.jpg Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve Christopher Posted December 17, 2011 Author Share Posted December 17, 2011 ! Moderator Note Moving to speculations This is debunked by long range travel, satellites, and of course photos taken from space craft.... http://www.wallpaper...68_1024x768.jpg wrong. http://www.lhup.edu/...llow/morrow.htm I chatted the guy. all his debunking is purely speculative and he admitted it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moontanman Posted December 17, 2011 Share Posted December 17, 2011 wrong. Why is that wrong, we have visited the moon and sent robot probes to every planet but Pluto, why is this wrong? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve Christopher Posted December 18, 2011 Author Share Posted December 18, 2011 Why is that wrong, we have visited the moon and sent robot probes to every planet but Pluto, why is this wrong? wise up, dude -1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moontanman Posted December 18, 2011 Share Posted December 18, 2011 wise up, dude No problem, let me put on my tin foil hat so the aliens can't read my thoughts first.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve Christopher Posted December 18, 2011 Author Share Posted December 18, 2011 well I outta here, you disrespect by moving the thread. see ya. tardos -1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phi for All Posted December 18, 2011 Share Posted December 18, 2011 wrong. I chatted the guy. all his debunking is purely speculative and he admitted it. wise up, dude well I outta here, you disrespect by moving the thread. see ya. tardos None of this answers the questions you were asked. It's not an accepted, peer-reviewed hypothesis, and we put all such ideas in Speculations until they prove otherwise. It's not disrespectful, it's just policy. What's disrespectful is to not answer direct questions. We've been outside the range of what you call the glass ceiling, and the earth doesn't appear inverted, it appears spherical. How do you explain this? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
michel123456 Posted December 18, 2011 Share Posted December 18, 2011 (edited) Thanks to Steve I made yesterday a trip in another universe. I found weird stuff, amongst it this interesting (to me) article about mathematician M. Abdelkader. Which showed evidently the power of mathematics. And inside of maths, the power of the positive/negative sign. There is no mention of glass sky anywhere. Steve putted New Jerusalem inside the glass sky. This thread belongs to religion. Today I woke up in my old-known convex universe, which you must admit is at least the same bizarre as the concave one. It was fun. I wonder how serious is Steve about this. Edited December 18, 2011 by michel123456 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Cuthber Posted December 18, 2011 Share Posted December 18, 2011 By replying at all we afforded this idea more respect than it is due. I predict that Steve will not come back and answer the questions we have posed (because he clearly can't) so I guess the best thing to do is let this thread die. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phi for All Posted December 18, 2011 Share Posted December 18, 2011 By replying at all we afforded this idea more respect than it is due. I predict that Steve will not come back and answer the questions we have posed (because he clearly can't) so I guess the best thing to do is let this thread die. Sorry, it's hard to read your post since it's raining here, and the inverted bowl of my world is filling up rapidly, and of course, since I am the center of the universe, the whole world's rain ends up here very quickly. Gotta go, water is up to my <glub> <glub> <gorble> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Cuthber Posted December 18, 2011 Share Posted December 18, 2011 OOps! Never mind, quick everyone! start running Westward. That will spin the universe round to the East and centrifugal force* will redistribute the water. * I know there's some debate about the existence of centrifugal force, but in this thread it's really not the issue is it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dimreepr Posted December 18, 2011 Share Posted December 18, 2011 Hi, I'm new here but I wanted to show you people how the true nature of the universe is actually a tiny, inverted one. Cyrus Teed's foundational premise that the Earth's surface is concave and all the planets, sun, moon and stars are actually very small in relation to it and fit inside a hollow, inverted Earth has never been debunked. In addition to his theory I want to point out the optical illusory effects of the glass ceiling about 70 miles high that plays tricks on the eye and causes one to perceive the sun and moon as spherical but are actually not. Her are some videos from m y webpage I made concerning the subject at hand. Here's my webpage that consolidates my explanation.... http://www.missterib...icepiphany.html This is a parradox, how can you believe this and be able to write it down. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Appolinaria Posted December 18, 2011 Share Posted December 18, 2011 We're obviously holograms from black holes. The alien's baubles are much cooler than hollow spheres with battery operated suns. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moontanman Posted December 18, 2011 Share Posted December 18, 2011 I'm a bit disappointed, it seemed like a good speculation thread to me, could have generated some interesting posts, I honestly didn't realize he was positively asserting the idea was real... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phi for All Posted December 18, 2011 Share Posted December 18, 2011 This is a classic example of where someone didn't respond to reason, or even reasonable requests, so we resorted to ridicule to get the point across. No one ridiculed the poster, just his idea, even though he made personal attacks in half his posts. I think this bunch of tardos is wised-up enough already. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Appolinaria Posted December 18, 2011 Share Posted December 18, 2011 Space doesn't exist, it's a sphere and there's a layer of glass, a meteor cracked it that's how we know... Orly? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve Christopher Posted December 19, 2011 Author Share Posted December 19, 2011 (edited) still watch occasionally to see if any of you have wised up yet.... Edited December 19, 2011 by Steve Christopher -1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
uncool Posted December 19, 2011 Share Posted December 19, 2011 (edited) And you'll soon watch this thread close unless you actually manage to provide some evidence. =Uncool- Edited December 19, 2011 by uncool Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phi for All Posted December 19, 2011 Share Posted December 19, 2011 still watch occasionally to see if any of you have wised up yet.... So... we're just supposed to accept an idea you won't answer our questions about? How is that "wise"? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve Christopher Posted December 19, 2011 Author Share Posted December 19, 2011 And you'll soon watch this thread close unless you actually manage to provide some evidence. =Uncool- you might want to close it then, that would be the final strike. 2 strikes and you loose. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
uncool Posted December 19, 2011 Share Posted December 19, 2011 (edited) you might want to close it then, that would be the final strike. 2 strikes and you loose. So you would rather leave here than actually provide any evidence? You already have two strikes against you. You started a thread without any evidence, and when pressed for evidence, you have refused to do so. You might want to continue posting without any content. That would be the final strike. =Uncool- Edited December 19, 2011 by uncool Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
michel123456 Posted December 19, 2011 Share Posted December 19, 2011 still watch occasionally to see if any of you have wised up yet.... How do you explain sunrise and sunset? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts