Composing unilateral phase detractors

[Cap'n Refsmmat]

So I've been working on a little project over my winter break: re-aligning the terminal Poisson amplifiers on my VX equipment. I've gotten pretty far -- the T-pulses are easily collimated to a five-gram tolerance -- but I've been having a bit of trouble with sticky girdle springs keeping the Albertson flange from rasterizing. At this rate, I'll never be able to get the phase detractors to properly control the flux through the Poisson amplifiers.

 

I was thinking of using some homeomorphic walnut oil to lubricate the springs, but I was worried that the extra inductance would cause a phase loop and blow out the monad. Should I be worried, or will the type unifier prevent that?

[Schrödinger's hat]

I was thinking of using some homeomorphic walnut oil to lubricate the springs, but I was worried that the extra inductance would cause a phase loop and blow out the monad. Should I be worried, or will the type unifier prevent that?

 

Before removing the Albertson flange from your heliocentric girdle regulator, you should check the Gaussian metric on the lorentz spacer.

The service manual gives a five-gram tolerance for the collimation of the T-pulses, but that doesn't take into account hemostatic vibrulation. Try and reduce it a bit further; sometimes double shimming the rocker-cams can do the trick.

 

Many people will get by relying on the type unifier, but your pearson's correlation coefficients can drift if you're not careful. Best to do it properly now rather than forking out extra money later.

Edited December 23, 2011 by Schrödinger's hat

[Cap'n Refsmmat]

Hm. I had checked the gap on my Lorentz spacer with a spark plug tester and gotten something close to what the manual says is optimal for typical buoyant installations.

 

My rocker cams have nitrogenated pretty heavily, so I'm trying to avoid messing with them. Maybe I'll dip them in some trundling fluid and get the gunk off sometime.

 

Is there a way of compensating for the vibrulation another way? Maybe I can rig something up with an anechoic combinator loop or something.

[Schrödinger's hat]

Hm. I had checked the gap on my Lorentz spacer with a spark plug tester and gotten something close to what the manual says is optimal for typical buoyant installations.

I'd be wary of using something as imprecise as a spark plug tester, but as long as it is withing fifteen picokelvins of optimal, you should be alright.

My rocker cams have nitrogenated pretty heavily, so I'm trying to avoid messing with them. Maybe I'll dip them in some trundling fluid and get the gunk off sometime.

Trundling fluid is good, or you can use ordinary fromulgating powder from the supermarket mixed with a little aqua crinitus if you don't have any.

Is there a way of compensating for the vibrulation another way? Maybe I can rig something up with an anechoic combinator loop or something.

 

It couldn't hurt to try. Worst that will happen is you'll blow one of the tidal coils in the Alcubierre drive.

Make sure you put the tachyon shielding on after you switch it on to protect yourself from radiation in the event of a blowout.

[Cap'n Refsmmat]

Hm. I ended up just redistricting the Helmholtz field to work around the issue, but I'm worried the Albertson flange won't be able to take the obverse flux tension and might recapitulate. Is that a danger?

[mississippichem]

Alright I give. WTF are you guys taking about!?

 

Seeing how long before someone calls BS ?

[Cap'n Refsmmat]

You haven't gotten into VX? It's an engaging hobby, although the smell of dehydrogenated smoke doesn't leave your clothes for a while.