slickinfinit Posted November 19, 2004 Posted November 19, 2004 I am a Canadian and I seen a strong repulican base who knew what it stood for and kept doing all the right things to win the voters, the democrats were trying to define themselves til the last day and thta was bad because exit polls showed large numbers of hispanic, non-religious and registered democrats voted for bush. I think Moore's 911 documentry was to biased to to sway voters and in some cases helped bush. Look at the electoral demographics Bush trounced in rual areas and places where the economy was weak which was the democrats best chance to inspire need for change.Iraq is a matter of opinion and changing leadership in a war time is rare and Kerry should have kept hammering bush on the very weak economy which clearly Bush campianers treid to spin into good news and blame it on Clinton lol . I would have rather Kerry pres but Bush simply ran a better race and won, the republicans are very good at what they do and if democrats want to stay with it they need serious reform.
r1dermon Posted November 20, 2004 Posted November 20, 2004 it hurt bush a lot more than it helped him, as did howard stern going on his whole rant. i think it just shows what a sad state this country is in. nobody knows a thing about whats going on. probably about 12% of people who voted ACTUALLY knew what is going on in the world. which is a sad thing
r1dermon Posted November 20, 2004 Posted November 20, 2004 it hurt bush a lot more than it helped him, as did howard stern going on his whole rant. i think it just shows what a sad state this country is in. nobody knows a thing about whats going on. probably about 12% of people who voted ACTUALLY knew what is going on in the world. which is a sad thing
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now