blazinfury Posted January 10, 2012 Posted January 10, 2012 Does a chemical reaction proceed from low pKa to high pKa or high pKa to low pKa? A large Ka implies how readily a reaction goes toward the products. Now since pKa=-log(Ka), wouldn't that imply that a chemcial reaction goes from high pKa to low pKa?
mississippichem Posted January 10, 2012 Posted January 10, 2012 (edited) Does a chemical reaction proceed from low pKa to high pKa or high pKa to low pKa? A large Ka implies how readily a reaction goes toward the products. Now since pKa=-log(Ka), wouldn't that imply that a chemcial reaction goes from high pKa to low pKa? Remember that we can write a pKa for a reaction but not for a compound per se. Often times it looks like a pKa is written for a compound but it is really just the reaction: [ce] HA \rightarrow H^{+}+A^{-}[/ce] So obviously here the pKa is: [math] pKa = -\log \left ( \frac{[H^{+}][A^{-}]}{[HA]}\cdot \frac{\gamma_{H} \gamma_{A}}{\gamma_{\mathrm{HA}}} \right )[/math] Where the all the activity coefficients, [math] \gamma [/math] are very close to unity for an ideal solution. So the answer to your question is neither. An acid/base equilibrium reaction with a low pKa will be product favored when written in the form: [ce] HA \rightarrow H^{+}+A^{-}[/ce] Or will be reactant favored if written as: [ce] H^{+} + A^{-} \rightarrow HA [/ce] *I don't know how to LaTeX equilibrium arrows so forgive my notational travesty please . Remember that the equilibrium constant says nothing about the kinetics of a reaction. You can use equilibrium to obtain thermodynamic state functions like Gibbs energy, a measure of spontaneity, but this says nothing about the reaction "proceeding". A reaction can be both thermodynamically and equilibrium favored but proceed at a rate that is slow enough to be practically unobservable. Edited January 10, 2012 by mississippichem
hypervalent_iodine Posted January 10, 2012 Posted January 10, 2012 http://www.scienceforums.net/topic/17898-the-chemistry-latex-tutorial/ There is no excuse!! Bidirectional Equations We sometimes need an equation that is not mono-directional but can flow in two ways and we thus require another arrow form: [ce]6CO2 + 6H2O <=> C6H12O6 + 6O2[/ce]
mississippichem Posted January 10, 2012 Posted January 10, 2012 http://www.scienceforums.net/topic/17898-the-chemistry-latex-tutorial/ There is no excuse!! Bah. [ce]\mathrm{nice} \ \mathrm{person} <=>\mathrm{bad} \ \mathrm{person} [/ce] You are being mostly product favored right now. , [math] K_{c} >>> 1 [/math].
hypervalent_iodine Posted January 11, 2012 Posted January 11, 2012 Maybe I'll go to a neo-nazi convention and try to shift the equilibrium to the left.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now