Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hello,

here is semi classical formula for gravitational acceleration which perfectly predicts "relativistic" effects like precession of the Mercury.

I have tested it by numerical integration. I can post very simple code of the program if somebody would like to test it.

But I would be thankful if somebody would help to derive a formula of mentioned precession analytically.

Posted (edited)

Not a great link

 

 

Forbidden

You don't have permission to access on this server.

Edited by imatfaal
Posted (edited)

Here is corrected version of the mentioned acceleration.

->http://www.part.lt/img/db0d42e1474f160a32a4c0bcd95deb4a335.png

It gives the same precession by 0.103 arc seconds per revolution

but now it has much more clear meaning.

Also it is simpler. Maybe now somebody will be able to help with analytical derivation of the precession?

Or maybe someone can offer some other interesting cases to test this formula?

 

// Just copy/paste the link to your browser if direct link do not work.

// Maybe some issues between servers which I do not understand.

Edited by NewR
  • 1 month later...
Posted

Hello,

here is semi classical formula for gravitational acceleration which perfectly predicts "relativistic" effects like precession of the Mercury.

I have tested it by numerical integration. I can post very simple code of the program if somebody would like to test it.

But I would be thankful if somebody would help to derive a formula of mentioned precession analytically.

 

how did you test it, what method of numerical integration and how did you measure the precession once you had the data. I ask because I have been having troubles with a program for the same purpose, I numerically integrate and then fit the data to an ellipse, semiaxis measures are perfect but the precession rate is way off.

  • 4 weeks later...
Posted (edited)

Hello,

here is semi classical formula for gravitational acceleration which perfectly predicts "relativistic" effects like precession of the Mercury.

I have tested it by numerical integration. I can post very simple code of the program if somebody would like to test it.

But I would be thankful if somebody would help to derive a formula of mentioned precession analytically.

 

You do not give any detail (input values, uncertainties...) about your empirical formula, but what really surprises me is that you title this as "without relativity" when I can see a c2 factor in your empirical formula :rolleyes:.

Edited by juanrga

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.