DrRocket Posted February 21, 2012 Posted February 21, 2012 Edit: I propose that that Dr Rocket be made a designated Expert. It would be best to drop this.
Xittenn Posted February 21, 2012 Posted February 21, 2012 I don't know who to believe. I know that their credentials won't guarantee who is correct and who is not, but if I determined that one of them had a PhD in physics and the other was an avid reader of science fiction, I would have some useful information. Most statements like these can be verified with little effort by completely unqualified individuals should they implement a little research! Whichever is the one that pulls the most results in its favour, or in a definitive statement no results tends to be insightful. Mendel Sachs says no :/
zapatos Posted February 21, 2012 Posted February 21, 2012 Most statements like these can be verified with little effort by completely unqualified individuals should they implement a little research! Whichever is the one that pulls the most results in its favour, or in a definitive statement no results tends to be insightful. Mendel Sachs says no :/ Completely agree. There are many ways to help you determine if information is valid. I am simply saying that researching someone's credentials is one of them. And if I do a Google search on this topic, I am still going to look at the credentials of the web site I land on. (Was it MIT.com or pseudoscience.com?) 1
Xittenn Posted February 21, 2012 Posted February 21, 2012 Completely agree. There are many ways to help you determine if information is valid. I am simply saying that researching someone's credentials is one of them. And if I do a Google search on this topic, I am still going to look at the credentials of the web site I land on. (Was it MIT.com or pseudoscience.com?) Absolutely, but I tend to think of a forum as a place for suggestions and insight rather than a place to gain factual information. I don't care if the person on the other end is God, at some point I will confirm with a text. This is quite unlike when I read a text, where I simply accept what I read until I am required to apply it in a meaningful way or I find some problem with it. It's a forum, a great place to find new ideas from people who already had them, not really a place to learn. A lot of this talk is entirely too serious, it chases people away and makes it sound like an educational facility which it is in no way that. . . .
ajb Posted February 21, 2012 Posted February 21, 2012 ... I tend to think of a forum as a place for suggestions and insight rather than a place to gain factual information. This is in my opinion the way to view things. Get direction from other people here, but as some level you will either have to find a reliable source, say a reputable book or a published paper (even then no guarantee of 100% correct) or work it out yourself. The second suggestion is very much true for mathematics and I would say basic physics. The best way to learn is by doing.
zapatos Posted February 21, 2012 Posted February 21, 2012 Absolutely, but I tend to think of a forum as a place for suggestions and insight rather than a place to gain factual information. I don't care if the person on the other end is God, at some point I will confirm with a text. This is quite unlike when I read a text, where I simply accept what I read until I am required to apply it in a meaningful way or I find some problem with it. It's a forum, a great place to find new ideas from people who already had them, not really a place to learn. A lot of this talk is entirely too serious, it chases people away and makes it sound like an educational facility which it is in no way that. . . . This is in my opinion the way to view things. Get direction from other people here, but as some level you will either have to find a reliable source, say a reputable book or a published paper (even then no guarantee of 100% correct) or work it out yourself. The second suggestion is very much true for mathematics and I would say basic physics. The best way to learn is by doing. For me this place is very much a learning resource. I understand how you two use this site, but my interest in science is more casual, and I am not going to apply it at work or in school. Everything I hear all day long I look at with a critical eye, whether it is someone's interpretation of Relativity or directions to a concert. It is not so much an overt process, but I always consider the source, weigh the risks of accepting the information as given, and determine whether further research is required or whether to just move on with what I've been told. At this point I know the credentials of you two well enough to be comfortable accepting that what you speak of with confidence is likely correct. While I would not accept what you say without checking if I was designing a new wing for a fighter jet, I am not likely to check up on what you tell me if I only have a casual interest in it.
Klaynos Posted February 21, 2012 Posted February 21, 2012 I don't know who to believe. I know that their credentials won't guarantee who is correct and who is not, but if I determined that one of them had a PhD in physics and the other was an avid reader of science fiction, I would have some useful information. This is why I try and provide at least one reference when I post a statement similar to that which you refer. This isn't always possible due to time and other matters. ajb is one of the best at doing that though and he should be commended for it.
swansont Posted February 21, 2012 Posted February 21, 2012 This is why I try and provide at least one reference when I post a statement similar to that which you refer. This isn't always possible due to time and other matters. ajb is one of the best at doing that though and he should be commended for it. I think that overall the correlation between those who have a strong science background and posting useful/valid references is pretty strong.
ewmon Posted February 21, 2012 Posted February 21, 2012 The idea of "experts" in forums is too top-down, authoritarian and slippery-slope-ish for me. Instead, I look to forums as a discussion among colleagues etc. I think it would also be too heavy to add an "Ask the Experts" sub-forum. A "forum" means an open assembly allowing discussions, and in Latin, it means "public square" or "marketplace". As to supporting our claims, we should provide either enough information to allow people to easily search, find and learn for themselves or provide links to a recognized authority. For example, recently in the Is race real? thread, I explicitly mentioned the term "ecogeographical rules" and gave a few examples of those rules. This easily allows people to find and read about these phenomena, to investigate further, and to decide for themselves. 1
Moontanman Posted February 21, 2012 Posted February 21, 2012 I want "Home Aquarium Expert" under my avatar
Phi for All Posted February 21, 2012 Posted February 21, 2012 I want "Home Aquarium Expert" under my avatar You'll have to go through betta-testing first.
Moontanman Posted February 21, 2012 Posted February 21, 2012 You'll have to go through betta-testing first. I knew there had to be a catch...
ajb Posted February 21, 2012 Posted February 21, 2012 As to supporting our claims, we should provide either enough information to allow people to easily search, find and learn for themselves or provide links to a recognized authority. Unless it is "common knowledge", I try to provide references where possible and appropriate.
DrRocket Posted February 23, 2012 Posted February 23, 2012 (edited) I think that overall the correlation between those who have a strong science background and posting useful/valid references is pretty strong. Except, perhaps, if you call yourself Brian Cox. In general if you have a question and need a definitive answer: If it is about science, ask a scientist. If it is about engineering, ask an engineer. If it is about accounting, ask an accountant. If it is about cooking, ask a cook. If it is about philosopy, ............................... you are screwed Edited February 23, 2012 by DrRocket
ajb Posted February 24, 2012 Posted February 24, 2012 Except, perhaps, if you call yourself Brian Cox. See what Swansont has started! This is not going to go away any time soon. LOL!
swansont Posted February 24, 2012 Posted February 24, 2012 See what Swansont has started! This is not going to go away any time soon. LOL! I would say the Brian started it with his mistaken statement in video and in print. I just pointed it out. To be fair, though, I don't think that one error should quash anyone's credibility. The issue is that when you get up on the stage, you leave yourself open to scrutiny and criticism. You have to deal with that.
ajb Posted February 24, 2012 Posted February 24, 2012 I would say the Brian started it with his mistaken statement in video and in print. I just pointed it out. Absolutely right. My comment was made in jest.
swansont Posted February 24, 2012 Posted February 24, 2012 Absolutely right. My comment was made in jest. No worries. I assumed it was, but OTOH there is occasionally a kill-the-messenger mentality that crops up.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now