Schrödinger's hat Posted February 25, 2012 Posted February 25, 2012 (edited) Just one of those slightly interesting, but not very meaningful things that you notice from time to time. Average human cell is a few microns. [math](10^{-6}m)^3\times 1000kg\times 10^{27}[/math] Gives somewhere on the order of 10^12 atoms about 10^13 cells in a human body. about 10^10 humans on earth about 10^11 to 10^12 stars in the galaxy about 10^12 galaxies in the observable universe about 10^10 transistors in a modern cpu. Up to 10^12 if you count storage as part of the computer. So somewhere between 10 billion and 10 trillion things make a thing that acts in a completely new way. Edited February 25, 2012 by Schrödinger's hat 1
StringJunky Posted February 25, 2012 Posted February 25, 2012 (edited) So somewhere between 10 billion and 10 trillion things make a thing that acts in a completely new way. They are all examples of Emergence. Edited February 25, 2012 by StringJunky
Schrödinger's hat Posted February 25, 2012 Author Posted February 25, 2012 They are all examples of Emergence. Indeed. I was mostly commenting on how close the numbers were that took you from one scale to another. Although, upon fleshing it out, they were more widely spaced than it first looked
michel123456 Posted February 25, 2012 Posted February 25, 2012 Just one of those slightly interesting, but not very meaningful things that you notice from time to time. Average human cell is a few microns. [math](10^{-6}m)^3\times 1000kg\times 10^{27}[/math] Gives somewhere on the order of 10^12 atoms about 10^13 cells in a human body. about 10^10 humans on earth about 10^11 to 10^12 stars in the galaxy about 10^12 galaxies in the observable universe about 10^10 transistors in a modern cpu. Up to 10^12 if you count storage as part of the computer. So somewhere between 10 billion and 10 trillion things make a thing that acts in a completely new way. When astrophysicts describe a star, they explain the phenomena (the star) from the molecular or even atomic size directly to the size of the star, jumping over the human or even planetary size. IIRC some may even explain the whole universe directly from the subatomic level.
Schrödinger's hat Posted February 25, 2012 Author Posted February 25, 2012 When astrophysicts describe a star, they explain the phenomena (the star) from the molecular or even atomic size directly to the size of the star, jumping over the human or even planetary size. IIRC some may even explain the whole universe directly from the subatomic level. Point. There are more like 10^57 atoms in a star. I guess things in things isn't really what I was getting at. More like.....a trillion is what takes us from a scale where we speak about things one way to a scale where we speak about them differently.
michel123456 Posted February 26, 2012 Posted February 26, 2012 (edited) Point. There are more like 10^57 atoms in a star. I guess things in things isn't really what I was getting at. More like.....a trillion is what takes us from a scale where we speak about things one way to a scale where we speak about them differently. How many atoms in the smallest possible crystal? Edited February 26, 2012 by michel123456
Xittenn Posted February 26, 2012 Posted February 26, 2012 How may atoms in the smallest possible crystal? How, many licks does it take to get to the center of the tootsiepop? 3? The world may never know!
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now