Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Reference :http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Claytronics

Claytronics is an abstract future concept that combines nanoscale robotics and computer science to create individual nanometer-scale computers called claytronic atoms, or catoms, which can interact with each other to form tangible 3-D objects that a user can interact with. This idea is more broadly referred to as programmable matter.[1] Claytronics has the potential to greatly affect many areas of daily life, such as telecommunication, human-computer interfaces, and entertainment.I will and some people like to know more about such technologies and other related future technologies.

 

 

Posted

Hello Aman shah,

 

The next comment is not criticism - only a friendly tip.

 

On the forum, we like to discuss something. So, if you ask a good question, you will get a better response. That's better for everybody.

Here, you ask just for "more information"... it is too open. And you will notice that the thread will not go in the direction you like. With a good question, you can give the thread the direction you like!

 

cheers,

CP

 

Back on topic (I hope): is this claytronics much different from the supercolonies of ants, bees and other insects?

Posted (edited)

Yes,that is much different,the small particles are basically tiny computer chips that are programmed to communicate and combine with each other in order to form a shape!This technology is still under R&D.

 

I also came to know about a similar type of technology but a bit different(smart dust):

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Smartdust

Edited by Aman shah
Posted

Yes,that is much different,the small particles are basically tiny computer chips that are programmed to communicate and combine with each other in order to form a shape!This technology is still under R&D.

 

I also came to know about a similar type of technology but a bit different(smart dust):

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Smartdust

But ants can make

, using nothing but themselves (they link their own bodies to make a bridge). It sounds like it fits the description...
Posted
rolleyes.gifYes,I do agree,but they programme themself ,here in claytronics scientists use static force of attraction and softwares to program them.
Posted

rolleyes.gifYes,I do agree,but they programme themself ,here in claytronics scientists use static force of attraction and softwares to program them.

 

I agree with CaptainPanic, Computer scientists build models that approximate the systems of ants, bees, ..etc

 

models that approximate, but are never the exact .. in-between Soundness and Abstractness

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.