Jump to content

Numerology Versus Science...


Steven Hawkins

Recommended Posts

Numerology Versus Science...

 

Hello everyone, I would like to show using pure numbers that there is strong evidence that supports the hidden variables theory so spoken about in the science world in relation to The Quantum of Action. I will also show how this simple procedure can demonstrate a more accurate result, than the Schrödinger Equation itself, and will prove to find other hidden variables, within the structures of which scientist use today to measure Special Relativity among other interest.

 

I have read the forum rules in which states that any claim must "show" scientific proof" so I chose the Schrödinger Equation replacing the structures of the function with numerology, which yields the same results. Please follow along, and I will explain as I get responses.. Thanks!

 

 

This is the area of interest here:

This is a link to the area of interest : http://en.wikipedia....iki/Spin-%C2%BD

 

 

S = the sqrt of 1/2* 1/2+1 * h bar = sqrt of 3/2*h bar

 

1/2 = 0.5

 

0.5+1 = 1.5

 

0.5*1.5 = 0.75

 

0.75^(1/2) = 0.86602540378444 what I am going to find is this 0.866 beta.

 

 

Below I am using "a number" with the h bar, this then is "spanned" so that:

 

 

 

 

h bar = 1.05509554140127e-33*7659.869412663662 = 8.08189406501739e-30=1.68033009738001e+27=1218019.866102915

......................................h*c = 19 86

 

What I did here, is multiplied the h bar by "7659.869412663662" spanned the resulting numbers, and revealed beta as "copies" of the h bar.. The trick to the matter is in the following:

 

 

 

1= [1,x] =The Speed of light as 1

 

1= [1,y]= matrix A

 

1= [2,z]=matrix B

 

So that:

 

1= [1,x] / [1= [1,y] + 1= [2,z]=2] = 0.5

 

0.5+1,x = 1.5

 

0.5*1.5 = 0.75

 

0.75^(1/2) = 0.86602540378444<---- beta as in .866

 

 

Spin 1/2 is actually 360+360 = 720 degrees = spin 1/2, where 1 is the speed of light, just like it is written above.

 

"Both" matrices and matrix also holds true so that: 1= [1,y]= matrix A , 1= [2,z]=matrix , and yes I know that is matrix z. I find it very interesting how simple numerology yields even better results.

 

However, let us not forget that "every" integer of 1v+2v+3v... ALL MUST FOLLOW THIS SAME PROCESS.....If not they remain dimensionless copies of the h bar.

 

 

 

 

 

thnks...

Edited by Steven Hawkins
Link to comment
Share on other sites

OP:

 

You already have a thread on this. I suspected that you were up to numerology.

 

You are just arbitrarily adding numbers. I doubt you will achieve any meaningful result.

 

The Schroedinger equation is not relativistic anyway. That's where Dirac comes in.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.