Klaynos Posted April 12, 2012 Posted April 12, 2012 you dont deserve it you ant earned it and thanks for wasting my time and tootaloo and good by BULLA Hi Bulla, I'd suggest you re-read the posts people made to you earlier in the thread. They haven't put their time into replying to annoy you but to try and help you understand the failings of your idea. They can only help if you are prepared to accept that you can be wrong. 1
swansont Posted April 12, 2012 Posted April 12, 2012 Listen mate no one speaks to me in that manner It would seem that this is a false statement. 1
bulla Posted April 13, 2012 Author Posted April 13, 2012 Ok then you people have unbanned my OP so now are you ready to enter the world of quantum atomic optics like you have never understood it before or are you going to continue like a mob of spoil t school children And I come on here in my own stsus not yours cos you have never seen this data nor do you understand it but I come to try to teach you but if you think your more intellergent then just say so an I will leave And I warn you mods stay of my case
hypervalent_iodine Posted April 13, 2012 Posted April 13, 2012 Ok then you people have unbanned my OP so now are you ready to enter the world of quantum atomic optics like you have never understood it before or are you going to continue like a mob of spoil t school children And I come on here in my own stsus not yours cos you have never seen this data nor do you understand it but I come to try to teach you but if you think your more intellergent then just say so an I will leave ! Moderator Note Careful how you tread, bulla. You've been asked questions that you are expected to answer and back up with evidence. I suggest you read the Speculation forum rules and become familiar with them. Staff here aren't out to get you. All we ask is that you follow our rules in the same way we expect all of our membership to do. Please do not respond to this modnote.
bulla Posted April 13, 2012 Author Posted April 13, 2012 (edited) let me explain, you dont know how to make gravity but I do so are you interested or not to listen with respect Ok let me put a hypothesis, if your rules prevent your site and all you people from discovering a totaly new science then what do you want me to do its your choice mod And further this new science will take you into the world of Quantum Atomic optics that you never thought existed Edited April 13, 2012 by bulla
Klaynos Posted April 13, 2012 Posted April 13, 2012 let me explain, you dont know how to make gravity but I do so are you interested or not to listen with respect Ok let me put a hypothesis, if your rules prevent your site and all you people from discovering a totaly new science then what do you want me to do its your choice mod Sorry to say, but this is getting pretty old pretty quick.
bulla Posted April 13, 2012 Author Posted April 13, 2012 look it is so far ahead of not only you Stanton uni is but a child in my arms with there split photonics crystal wafer switching do you even know about there research I bet not
hypervalent_iodine Posted April 13, 2012 Posted April 13, 2012 What I want is for you to reply to these requests: Evidence, please. <...> do you mean that type of litmus test, or the more "generalized" and metaphorical litmus test? This is confusing. <...> What percentages of actual occurences? Of rainbows? a continuum of what? set of 60 or more what? <...> Why do we need to spot *every* rainbow that happens in order to understand how they work? <...> You have to supply evidence for all of this, though. <...> How does any of this relate to producing a rainbow? <...> Also, if rainbows are produced from the ground and not from the sun, please explain why there are no rainbows during the night (without a white light source). Evidence or testable model. Now. <..> post your evidence. You are required as per our rules to provide a testable model, back your hypothesis up with evidence (note: not more baseless speculation) ... ! Moderator Note Put up or shut up time. If you don't respond to the above, this thread gets closed.
bulla Posted April 13, 2012 Author Posted April 13, 2012 So lets prat tell whos words were they crystal split photonics Ho you think Stanton Uni words what mod you frighten of the truth mate
mississippichem Posted April 13, 2012 Posted April 13, 2012 Alright let's see the data already! We'll judge it on it's scientific merit alone. You are witnessing an informal implementation of the scientific process. No data, no evidence...no acceptance.
bulla Posted April 13, 2012 Author Posted April 13, 2012 (edited) look mate I come back here because I need to get you lot as pomus as you are to understand some data now do you have some on on your forum that actually understands quantum atomic optics not some fairy thats read about it but some one that actually understands the theory Because I got the distinct impression the other day when I tryed to explain the crystalography of the atomics in existance I was being laughed at Edited April 13, 2012 by bulla
hypervalent_iodine Posted April 13, 2012 Posted April 13, 2012 Last chance, bulla. Post your evidence or this gets closed.
bulla Posted April 13, 2012 Author Posted April 13, 2012 and further more if your brave enough I will take you light years past both Newton and Einstein
mississippichem Posted April 13, 2012 Posted April 13, 2012 look mate I come back here because I need to get you lot as pomus as you are to understand some data now do you have some on on your forum that actually understands quantum atomic optics not some fairy thats read about it but some one that actually understands the theory Because I got the distinct impression the other day when I tryed to explain the crystalography of the atomics in existance I was being laughed at That's not data or evidence. Stop posturing and pony up the numbers.
bulla Posted April 13, 2012 Author Posted April 13, 2012 (edited) Its your choice mate its all in your hands you want me you are actualy challanging me to produce on here your piss ant forum the secret to both Newton and Einstine in what two minutes or two sentences which one do you want The way your behaving it may take two full months to explain it but you want proff now now now now instantly are you a bloody idiot or what just continually talking with out questions it would take without meal breaks and sleeps 5 weeks Edited April 13, 2012 by bulla -2
hypervalent_iodine Posted April 13, 2012 Posted April 13, 2012 ! Moderator Note Yeah, and when we get to El Dorado we'll be wealthy beyond our wildest dreams. Thread closed. You are not permitted to bring this topic up again. Don't say I didn't give you ample warning.
Klaynos Posted April 13, 2012 Posted April 13, 2012 So lets prat tell whos words were they crystal split photonics Ho you think Stanton Uni words what mod you frighten of the truth mate A link to what you are referring? With the information you've provided it is little more than gibberish. I work with some of the leading researches in photonic crystals in the world, so why don't you try and and actually provided some evidence or explanation? -- sorry cross posts with the thread being closed.
Recommended Posts