Yarn Posted May 7, 2012 Share Posted May 7, 2012 Coulombs law is F=kq1q2/r^2, where F is the force of repulsion between two charged objects, r is the distance between them, q1 and q2 are the objects' respective charges, and k is a constant whose value is dependent upon the medium between the 2 objects. The larger k is, the greater the force, and the smaller k is the smaller the force. k is at its greatest in a vacuum. In contrast, in water it is an eightyth as large. In the body it is about eighth as large. In rubber it is about half to a third. Etc etc. My question is why? I suspect it might have something to do with induction. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
timo Posted May 7, 2012 Share Posted May 7, 2012 If by "induction" you mean that the surrounding material reacts to the presence of a charge and becomes electrically polarized, you are correct. This should indeed also alter the net force between two charged objects in such a medium. However, I have my doubts that the relation [math]F=k q_1q_2/r^2[/math] holds true in water at all. Are you sure it's not a [math]k®[/math] (or that the "1/80 the value in vacuum" refers to a given distance) in the source where you have that from? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
swansont Posted May 7, 2012 Share Posted May 7, 2012 I think what you want to investigate is the polarizability ([math]\epsilon[/math], rather than [math]\epsilon_0[/math] for vacuum) of materials. A dielectric in an electric field will become polarized, and the electric field from that reduces the overall field present in the medium. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pmb Posted May 17, 2012 Share Posted May 17, 2012 I think what you want to investigate is the polarizability ([math]\epsilon[/math], rather than [math]\epsilon_0[/math] for vacuum) of materials. A dielectric in an electric field will become polarized, and the electric field from that reduces the overall field present in the medium. Nice response! That's my thought too, except I couldn't think of how to put it as elegantly as you have. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now