Gravity is the aether wind

[rwjefferson]

the answer to life, the universe and everything

 

Gravity is the aether wind. To measure the drag and direction of the aether wind, stand on a scale and look up.

 

given

Gravity is a state of force. Force is inertial pressure differential. Space consists of weakly interactive massive quantum particles. Weakly interactive means they are not easy to measure. Massive means they are subject to gravity.

 

before you unleash the hounds of dogma

Name one observation of gravity or van der vvaal's or casimere or weak or any other force that is not consistent with inertial pressure differential.

 

in the spirit of peace

ron

[rwjefferson]

before you unleash the hounds of dogma

Name one observation of gravity or van der vvaal's or casimere or weak or any other force that is not consistent with inertial pressure differential.

 

too late

Speculations abound. Some comments on your ill-defined theory:

I agree. You've already lost the argument.

Instead of kind and well reasoned response, the best you have on offer is a pitiful insult.

 

Dogma abounds. There you go again; confusing the hypothetical definitions of Classical Mythology with self evident observation.

 

~ mass carries the properties of inertia and gravity

~ weakly interactive means they only seem dark to the unenlightened

~ photons are carried on the aether wind.

 

I must have missed the revolution in Physics ...

 

You are not alone. Meet me here.

Has aether been disproved?

 

 

peace

ron

[swansont]

!

Moderator Note

Split for the gravity thread, because pet theories are not to be offered as answers to mainstream science questions. Also, please refrain from advertising your other speculative theories. That, too, is against the rules.

Responses to this moderator note should not be posted in this thread.

[ydoaPs]

 

before you unleash the hounds of dogma

Name one observation of gravity or van der vvaal's or casimere or weak or any other force that is not consistent with inertial pressure differential.

 

in the spirit of peace

ron

 

Give us a formalization first. How can we tell you if it is inconsistent if you've given us no measure? We need math.