Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Haven't seen this discussed on the forum yet:

 

 

NASA gets two military spy telescopes for astronomy.

By Joel Achenbach, Published: June 4

The announcement Monday raised the obvious question of why the

intelligence agency would no longer want, or need, two Hubble-class

telescopes. A spokeswoman, Loretta DeSio, provided information

sparingly.

"They no longer possessed intelligence-collection uses," she said of

the telescopes.

http://www.washingto...6UDV_story.html

 

 

Blog post on using the new telescopes for planetary defense, asteroid prospecting, and Mars orbiter satellites:

 

 

Low cost development and applications of the new NRO donated telescopes.

http://exoscientist....plications.html

 

 

Bob Clark

Edited by Robert Clark
  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

I had wondered if the initial optical aberration of Hubble came from its Keyhole (spy satellite) parent design, which has a 250km observation distance. I had tried to put some figures on the resulting aberration if using that optics at infinity observation distance and got a significant aberration...:huh:

 

So it could well be that the donated telescopes have that same aberration as initially Hubble had. Time to re-use Hubble's early correction software maybe? As an intervention in orbit must be too costly in the present context.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.