Robert Clark Posted June 13, 2012 Posted June 13, 2012 (edited) Haven't seen this discussed on the forum yet: NASA gets two military spy telescopes for astronomy. By Joel Achenbach, Published: June 4 The announcement Monday raised the obvious question of why the intelligence agency would no longer want, or need, two Hubble-class telescopes. A spokeswoman, Loretta DeSio, provided information sparingly. "They no longer possessed intelligence-collection uses," she said of the telescopes. http://www.washingto...6UDV_story.html Blog post on using the new telescopes for planetary defense, asteroid prospecting, and Mars orbiter satellites: Low cost development and applications of the new NRO donated telescopes. http://exoscientist....plications.html Bob Clark Edited June 13, 2012 by Robert Clark
Enthalpy Posted June 22, 2012 Posted June 22, 2012 I had wondered if the initial optical aberration of Hubble came from its Keyhole (spy satellite) parent design, which has a 250km observation distance. I had tried to put some figures on the resulting aberration if using that optics at infinity observation distance and got a significant aberration... So it could well be that the donated telescopes have that same aberration as initially Hubble had. Time to re-use Hubble's early correction software maybe? As an intervention in orbit must be too costly in the present context.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now