NSX Posted April 23, 2003 Posted April 23, 2003 I think he's going to have mental problems later on in his life b/c of you guys...hehe
fafalone Posted April 23, 2003 Author Posted April 23, 2003 To believe so deeply in the crap he does is already conclusive proof of severe mental problems.
Radical Edward Posted April 23, 2003 Posted April 23, 2003 well in our (sensible) eyes he has been proved wrong, but being alive a month from now with no planet showing up will prove him even more wrong. the problem is with cracks like him, is that when whatever event they are taking about doesn't come to pass, they just disappear and are never heard of again. I saw a TV interview with a guy who claimed the world was going to end in the 2000 eclipse, and so the hosts invited him to come back the day after if the world was still there. he said he would, but he never showed.
NSX Posted April 27, 2003 Posted April 27, 2003 Originally posted by Radical Edward he said he would, but he never showed. ...To save face?
greg1917 Posted April 27, 2003 Posted April 27, 2003 He didnt seem particularly fazed or bothered about the fact that there would be massive and catastrophic effects on life on the planet, just proud he thought it was going to happen and no one believed him. around the last eclipse there was a pagan monk in somerset who sold all his belongings and said to goodbye to his family because he was so sure massive storms would ravish the earth - he at least was confident enough in his beliefs, wrong or not, to take the action that would seem appropriate. he drifted into the irish sea in a dingy to meet his destiny then presumably sailed to land when nothing happened... i have a lot more respect for him than adam who doesnt even defend blatantly wrong dates, respond to valid arguments or take notice of glaring omissions and presumptions in his tinpot pseudoscience.
fafalone Posted April 28, 2003 Author Posted April 28, 2003 sacredcity3: http://www.space.com/spacewatch/lunar_eclipse_news_030425.html fafaIone: who cares, lunar eclipses happen all the time sacredcity3: this one even won't happpen sacredcity3: and ther won't be millons of eyes sacredcity3: drawn skyward sacredcity3: i told you every couple of days sacredcity3: they have a new bs article sacredcity3: that no one can confirm fafaIone: i think the 2 billion people who will be able to see it would be a good confirmation sacredcity3: but yet it has refferences that are similar to planetx/zetatalk sacredcity3: like may 15 date\\ fafaIone: if they were going to fake it, they would choose a viewing range that didn't encompass north america sacredcity3: why would they fake it fafaIone: they wouldn't, but you're saying it's not going to happen sacredcity3: this lunar eclipse sacredcity3: won't sacredcity3: astronomy.com has no refference to it sacredcity3: and space.com is associated with nasa fafaIone: http://aa.usno.navy.mil/data/docs/LunarEclipse.html sacredcity3: yea? fafaIone: http://www.netspeed.com.au/minnah/2003/2003.html sacredcity3: bs sacredcity3: au is australia? fafaIone: yes. fafaIone: i.e. not controlled by the US government. sacredcity3: what woud make the moon look coppery though? fafaIone: it doesnt' look "coppery" sacredcity3: then what makes it appear appear in shade of red/orange? fafaIone: in fact, this eclipse is all over the news fafaIone: http://news.google.com/news?num=100&hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&safe=off&q=lunar+eclipse&sa=N&tab=wn sacredcity3: years means the moon will likely rise coppery red on the West Coast. sacredcity3: what exactly makes it look red? fafaIone: well when you see the moon and its red, let me know, because it sure looked normal to me last night sacredcity3: they say it will look red during lunar eclipse sacredcity3: i dont think i eve rin my life saw moon appearing red in sky fafaIone: who says that fafaIone: any credible sources, or just zetatalk sacredcity3: A total lunar eclipse on May 15 the first in three years means the moon will likely rise coppery red on the West Coast. During a sacredcity3: site you gave me from google sacredcity3: http://www.whittierdailynews.com/Stories/0,1413,207~12026~1351176,00.html sacredcity3: and on space.com sacredcity3: the interpretation illustration they made it look reddish too\ fafaIone: its probably related to light absorbtion from the atmosphere gases with different bond energies... same reason sunsets appear reddish sacredcity3: now what if fafaIone: The ruddy color comes from sunlight scattered through Earth's atmosphere lighter or darker depending on the weather and dust. sacredcity3: we see 2 moons on may 15 sacredcity3: one is red and one normal color sacredcity3: ? fafaIone: not happening sacredcity3: oh and umm i almost forgot sacredcity3: http://www.cropcircleanswers.com/Icecircle_2003.htm sacredcity3: read the whole article sacredcity3: thats 10min from me fafaIone: flagrant idiocy
Radical Edward Posted April 28, 2003 Posted April 28, 2003 I've seen the moon go red lots of times. he is such a moron... thanks for the laugh
Sayonara Posted April 28, 2003 Posted April 28, 2003 "I didn't know the moon appears red during full lunar eclipse therefore any wild theory explaining it away as something bizarre that more than one webshite has mentioned will do for me." Idiot
greg1917 Posted April 28, 2003 Posted April 28, 2003 I dont know very much astronomy apart from the basics but surely the moon will appear in exactly the position, red or not, that it was always going to appear in. i would have presumed anyone with a basic knowledge of astronomy (ie not me) would be able to use charts to calculate the exact positions and times the moon is visible from a certain place on earth based on its orbital path so how can adam claim this is not the moon? thats like claiming when the sun rises at 6.30 its actually a massive flaming meteor coming for earth because its a large bright disk in the sky, regardless of the fact the sun has a habit of rising at that time of the day.
Dudde Posted May 1, 2003 Posted May 1, 2003 right...again, how old is he? oh well, thanks for relieving my boredom^_^
Dudde Posted May 2, 2003 Posted May 2, 2003 hmm...well for someone so old he doesn't seem to grasp some of the simpler concepts of BASIC science O_o oh well I guess...I dun know the guy...
YoungStrife Posted May 2, 2003 Posted May 2, 2003 Didn't you hear? He's 7000 years old, and 7 days older then the earth haha.:bs: Thanks for that thing Faf. What a fucking idiot lol. Didn't he learn we only have one moon in grade school or some shit? And by the way, the moon looks red sometimes because of the light that is captured in gasses by the sun. Depending on the gas, they may glow purple, red, orange, yellow, blue, and even green!...the green is scarce.
fafalone Posted May 4, 2003 Author Posted May 4, 2003 In this installment: Adam argues that Keplers Laws are flawed, right after professing his lack of interest and education in science. He also explains how evolution didn't happen, and there is no fossil record. This comes after him repeatedly asking where the missing link between humans and homo sapiens is, blissfully ignorant to the fact that we ARE homo sapiens. fafaIone: as i walked back from the library tonight, i looked up at all the stars... i twirled around looking at every area of the sky.. yet i didn't see anything abnormally bright or planetish... so where's planet x sacredcity3: i don[t know you pin point it to me sacredcity3: i forgot it existed fafaIone: it doesn't exist, thats the problem. sacredcity3: ur problem* fafaIone: since you wasted so much of my time trying to convince me that it existed, it's your problem. fafaIone: admit you were wrong sacredcity3: i'm not wrong fafaIone: then where is it? sacredcity3: i don't know fafaIone: wrong. sacredcity3: ill know when i see it fafaIone: and when is that going to be sacredcity3: may 15 fafaIone: since when do planets suddenly appear... we would be able to see it coming months away sacredcity3: not necessarily fafaIone: yes, there's no way a large planet would somehow evade eyesight until the day its close enough to flip the poles sacredcity3: it woudln't flip poles fafaIone: shift, whatever sacredcity3: its gravity would align wtih earths poles. fafaIone: gravity is not related to magnetic forces fafaIone: according the standard model at least sacredcity3: i'm sure it is fafaIone: if it was close enough to affect the earth gravitationally, it would destabilize our orbit around the sun sacredcity3: My judgements exsquisid fafaIone: which means it could have never have passed us before sacredcity3: that's nonsense fafaIone: no, it's basic science. sacredcity3: basic science updates as new information is found. sacredcity3: just like people though sun goes around earth sacredcity3: couple centuries ago, but polish guy disproved that fafaIone: the entire idea that planet x existed fafaIone: came from unknown gravitational interactions of other planets fafaIone: that couldn't be explained sacredcity3: an idea which was once respectuflly considered by NASA . and all the sudden discredited. fafaIone: and that hinges on our theory of gravity being accurate sacredcity3: theory of gravity fafaIone: so if our theory of gravity is flat out wrong, theres no reason to conclude theres another planet sacredcity3: there's plenty of other planets fafaIone: furthermore, if our understanding of gravity is so incredibly flawed fafaIone: not in this solar system sacredcity3: and your idea of gravity is a theory. sacredcity3: not a fact fafaIone: no, it is a fact sacredcity3: it's a fact? fafaIone: it's a fact that planets move according to the model sacredcity3: homosapien - human evolution sacredcity3: is a fact too? fafaIone: why that happens in a theory, but the fact that it happens is observable fafaIone: yes, evolution is a fact. sacredcity3: according to what model? sacredcity3: evolution sacredcity3: from homosapien to human is a fact? sacredcity3: so tell me what the link is fafaIone: homo sapien is human sacredcity3: that i'm not eliete enough to know sacredcity3: ... fafaIone: that's the name of our species fafaIone: homo sapien == human sacredcity3: hold on i'l look that up fafaIone: omfg, you're an idiot fafaIone: another 4th grade science fact you seem to have missed. sacredcity3: i'm not into science sacredcity3: and never will be fafaIone: no kidding fafaIone: so stop pretending like you can find flaws in keplers laws sacredcity3: there are flaws sacredcity3: and evolution is not a fact fafaIone: yes it is sacredcity3: but according to you sacredcity3: it is sacredcity3: just you sacredcity3: . sacredcity3: no one else sacredcity3: and it cannot be confirmed as a fact fafaIone: according to every educated individual sacredcity3: the missing link = ? fafaIone: yes, it can sacredcity3: what is the missing link = ? fafaIone: its called the fossil record sacredcity3: the missing link = ? fafaIone: we can look at fossils and see how they changed sacredcity3: you maybe. fafaIone: natural selection is a theory fafaIone: but evolution is a fact sacredcity3: okay i'm out. sacredcity3: it's not a fact sacredcity3: it's a joke fafaIone: yes, it is. fafaIone: go look at the fossils for yourself Auto response from sacredcity3: w
Dave Posted May 4, 2003 Posted May 4, 2003 It's not the fact that he's wrong that disturbs me. It's the fact that after all this time and scientific explanation, he's still spouting the same old crap and refusing to believe it's wrong. Then again, teh bit with the humans and homo-sapiens is quite funny tbh.
JaKiri Posted May 4, 2003 Posted May 4, 2003 Well, he is correct in saying that any theory of gravity is not fact, but to the extent that he takes it.
Radical Edward Posted May 5, 2003 Posted May 5, 2003 I think it comes down to his misunderstanding of the word "theory"
fafalone Posted May 17, 2003 Author Posted May 17, 2003 This time in Thread 777: Adam believes he knows where all of modern science is wrong, while claiming it's only for fat people and he doesn't actually understand it. He then goes on to claimthe show "Sightings" on the Sci-Fi channel proved skeptics wrong, and then just starts rambling about the KGB files. afaIone: where's planet x? why haven't the poles shifted? sacredcity3 wants to directly connect. sacredcity3 cancels request; no connection was made. sacredcity3 wants to directly connect. sacredcity3 cancels request; no connection was made. fafaIone wants to directly connect. sacredcity3 is now directly connected. sacredcity3: <picture of a normal sky> sacredcity3: <another picture of a normal sky> fafaIone: ...ok? sacredcity3: <yet another picture with nothing abnormal in it> sacredcity3: to the left of sun sacredcity3: there it is sacredcity3: visible sacredcity3: in sunset sacredcity3: in eastcoast fafaIone: thats not a planet you jackass sacredcity3: yes it is fafaIone: proof= sacredcity3: look for it yourself when sky is clear sacredcity3: at about sacredcity3: 7:30-8 fafaIone: pm? sacredcity3: yes fafaIone: it wasn't there last night while i was watching the eclipse fafaIone: perfectly clear sacredcity3: eclipse was at 11 fafaIone: eclipses take several hours... it started earlier than that sacredcity3: not here fafaIone: where are you sacredcity3: new england fafaIone: oh and nearby planets would be visible for more than 30 minutes in a day sacredcity3: not that visible. fafaIone: if they were close enough to cause a pole shift in the next several days they would sacredcity3: that's absurd fafaIone: i'm the one who knows basic astrophysics, remember? sacredcity3: No i don't remember fafaIone: yeah, remember when i was explaining to you how precession causes periodic, predictable pole shifts.. and you got bored and left because i was talking about real science sacredcity3: You're the one who thinks theres proof of final stage of human evolution sacredcity3: though sacredcity3: no i don't remeber that fafaIone: does the phrase "punctuated equilibrium" have any meaning for you? sacredcity3: no fafaIone: thats what i thought. go take any introductory biology course, then come tell me about a lack of evidence for evolution sacredcity3: Science is for fat people though sacredcity3: Fit don't need it fafaIone: then don't presume to know its flaws sacredcity3: yawn fafaIone: unless you understand something, you cannot tell someone who does understand it that its wrong fafaIone: world doesnt' work like that sacredcity3: go read some basics of fafaIone: ... sacredcity3: secrecy of kbg files fafaIone: the kgb disbanded decades ago sacredcity3: the files and videos sacredcity3: did not fafaIone: (yes, kgb, not kbg) sacredcity3: by the way sacredcity3: all the shit that was shown in that show sacredcity3: is a nice slap in the face sacredcity3: for you sceptics fafaIone: you cannot assess the validity of anything relating to evolution or astrophysics without having any knowledge at all fafaIone: what show? sacredcity3: the one that was on sci-fi sacredcity3: they ahve like sightings show fafaIone: rofl sacredcity3: they producers fafaIone: you're an idiot sacredcity3: no sacredcity3: im not fafaIone: i'm going out fafaIone: its friday night sacredcity3: go where fafaIone: have fun waiting for the pole shift, it might be another 10k years sacredcity3: the dining area sacredcity3: have a hang over next day sacredcity3: from overeating sacredcity3 direct connection is closed.
Sayonara Posted May 17, 2003 Posted May 17, 2003 sacredcity3: have a hang over next daysacredcity3: from overeating He's a troll then. Nobody can be that stupid without trying.
Dudde Posted May 17, 2003 Posted May 17, 2003 o_o ...normally I wouldn't say this...but what an IDIOT!! :lame: my ten year old cousin knows more about science than that
Dave Posted May 18, 2003 Posted May 18, 2003 Originally posted by Sayonara3 He's a troll then. Nobody can be that stupid without trying. You'd be surprised
Sayonara Posted May 18, 2003 Posted May 18, 2003 Originally posted by dave You'd be surprised Not after 2 years on PAGD, no. He's a troll. Ignore him faf.
blike Posted May 18, 2003 Posted May 18, 2003 Originally posted by Sayonara³ Not after 2 years on PAGD, no. He's a troll. Ignore him faf. Under normal circumstances, but Faf and I have "known" adam for over three years, well before this site was thought of..
Sayonara Posted May 18, 2003 Posted May 18, 2003 Is that supposed to make me think he isn't trolling you for responses?
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now