Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Our universe contains some (unknown) very large number of particles.

It is also our tenet that our laws of physics should be such as to also apply to a universe with a different number of particles.

That is they should be invariant to the number of particles.

 

So what is motion (ie what are the observables and what do they mean) for a universe containing a single particle?

Posted

No fields, potential wells or other restrictions are defined other than what the particle 'creates' by virtue of its own existence in an otherwise empty unbounded universe.

Posted

Motion is defined with respect to something else. A single particle is at rest with respect to itself, and if that's the only reference you have, then it's at rest. But it's not a realistic scenario.

Posted

So what is motion (ie what are the observables and what do they mean) for a universe containing a single particle?

 

Probably the same as in our universe. There is no absolute motion; so with nothing to move relative to there would be no relative motion either.

 

If it's a point particle perhaps you could consider the universe a singularity, with all measures of distance contracted to zero, so all motion occurs across 0 distance.

 

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.