ecoli Posted August 21, 2012 Posted August 21, 2012 BEHAVIOR OF YOUNG CHILDREN UNDER CONDITIONS SIMULATING ENTRAPMENT IN REFRIGERATORS Behavior of young children in a situation simulating entrapment in refrigerators was studied in order to develop standards for inside releasing devices, in accordance with Public Law 930 of the 84th Congress. Using a specially designed enclosure, 201 children 2 to 5 years of age took part in tests in which six devices were used, including two developed in the course of this experiment as the result of observation of behavior. Success in escaping was dependent on the device, a child's age and size and his behavior. It was also influenced by the educational level of the parents, a higher rate of success being associated with fewer years of education attained by mother and father combined. Three major types of behavior were observed: (1) inaction, with no effort or only slight effort to get out (24%); (2) purposeful effort to escape (39%); (3) violent action both directed toward escape and undirected (37%). I love this kind of stuff. source: Journal of Pediatrics 2
Ben Banana Posted August 21, 2012 Posted August 21, 2012 I just laughed when I read the title, but it got better.
imatfaal Posted August 22, 2012 Posted August 22, 2012 Good find. I was wondering what in hell was going through the Research Ethics Committee's mind when they granted the ok for the experiment till I saw this Received January 27, 1958. Accepted April 1, 1958. I would love to know what percentage of the seminal work of the early years of scientific research would actually be allowed to proceed now - I have actually seen people reduced to tears reading about some of the early child-psychology experiments and as for the Stanford Prison Experiment... 1
Appolinaria Posted August 26, 2012 Posted August 26, 2012 I have actually seen people reduced to tears reading about some of the early child-psychology experiments and as for the Stanford Prison Experiment... The Stanford Prison Experiment was child's play..... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_experimentation_in_the_United_States
ecoli Posted August 26, 2012 Author Posted August 26, 2012 They specifically mention no lasting psychological harm during the followup. This is obviously small time stuff compared to stuff in the wikipedia article.
John Cuthber Posted August 26, 2012 Posted August 26, 2012 If the experiment won't kill a few people it's probably not worth doing. http://www.lab-initio.com/screen_res/nz212.jpg
Appolinaria Posted August 26, 2012 Posted August 26, 2012 They specifically mention no lasting psychological harm during the followup. This is obviously small time stuff compared to stuff in the wikipedia article. Yes. I was just noting that there are much worse experiments to cry about.
Recommended Posts