ChanelR Posted September 7, 2012 Posted September 7, 2012 Hi there, So in recent years, biology and especially ecology, has taken a more quantitative approach to answering questions. The Janus Effect is a phenomenon that scientists sometimes employ to draw broad-scale conclusions that are out of the focus of a small-scale study. For example, finding a biochemical/genetic effect of a substance on an organism does not necessarily cause a population/ecosystem-level response. Nonetheless, it is important to work step-wise up the ladder of organisation and determine these broad-scale effects. How far do you think it is plausible/acceptable to extrapolate results from a regional quantitative landscape ecology to draw conclusions for other landscapes with roughly the same abiotic/biotic/spatio-temporal attributes? To what level is this accurate? Should we spend more time ground-truthing at the expense of further research? 1
FarmForest Research Posted September 8, 2012 Posted September 8, 2012 I am not sure what you mean by ground truthing? I also think you sound like a troll for a creationist belief? No one uses truth in biology we use observations. Hi there, So in recent years, biology and especially ecology, has taken a more quantitative approach to answering questions. The Janus Effect is a phenomenon that scientists sometimes employ to draw broad-scale conclusions that are out of the focus of a small-scale study. For example, finding a biochemical/genetic effect of a substance on an organism does not necessarily cause a population/ecosystem-level response. Nonetheless, it is important to work step-wise up the ladder of organisation and determine these broad-scale effects. How far do you think it is plausible/acceptable to extrapolate results from a regional quantitative landscape ecology to draw conclusions for other landscapes with roughly the same abiotic/biotic/spatio-temporal attributes? To what level is this accurate? Should we spend more time ground-truthing at the expense of further research? And the Janus effect I think you pulled out of thin very thin air.
ChanelR Posted September 11, 2012 Author Posted September 11, 2012 I think it's important to understand the terminology in the question before you throw out a reply like that.Ground-truthing refers to making physical observations and seeing whether they coincide with what models predict. E.g. predicting distributions of grey herons on a large spatial scale requires ground-truthing, i.e. people checking for grey herons in the area the model predicts grey herons inhabit.The Janus effect is a simple analogy that looks at the relationship of any level of organisation by analysing the level below it, and allows us to make predictions to a level above. E.g. Looking at the effects of rainfall on a plant's fitness (indiviual level) and understanding the physiology of the effect (one level below), and allows us to predict what will happen to the population of this plant (one level above).
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now