Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Nick - welcome to forum.

 

Could you maybe expand a little on what you are saying - or at least explain what prompts you to be so certain.

 

Physically there are fundamental particles that the standard model does not treat as divisible - the quarks (which make up protons and neutrons) and the electron are examples. Now I am pretty sure you don't have evidence that these particles are built up from/by smaller particles - so it must be a philosophical position, and no one is in a position to argue and attempt to refute that position without a greater knowledge of how you arrived at it

Posted (edited)

Nick - welcome to forum.

 

Could you maybe expand a little on what you are saying - or at least explain what prompts you to be so certain.

 

 

What prompts me to be so certain is logic. It is a logical position I took.

 

Physically there are fundamental particles that the standard model does not treat as divisible - the quarks (which make up protons and neutrons) and the electron are examples. Now I am pretty sure you don't have evidence that these particles are built up from/by smaller particles - so it must be a philosophical position, and no one is in a position to argue and attempt to refute that position without a greater knowledge of how you arrived at it

 

Supposedly the smallest theoretical particles are strings. If it is shown to be true, then I suppose that even they are made up of some type of objects.

Edited by NickH.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.