Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

From what I understand so far, objects cannot accelerate to the speed of light since it would require an infinite amount of energy and would increase the objects mass relative to a "motionless" observer. The object would become more massive as it tries to accelerate. If this is so then would the accelerating object become so massive that it would become a black hole, while in reference to itself nothing changes?

 

Another way to look at it is: if there was an extremely dense white dwarf star that is on the verge of black hole density and/or mass, and you started moving relative to it, to a considerable speed, but much less then before, then would we see the white dwarf transition to being a black hole due to relative motion?

 

I apologize if this is another case of an incomplete grasp of relativity, I'm young and am still learning. Thanks in advance for any replies.

Posted

So it can only appear to become a black hole?

 

 

It doesn't become a black hole, and it doesn't appear to be a black hole.

 

Relativistic mass, which is an outdated and misleading concept, does not contribute to gravity.

Posted

So is it the relative kinetic energy that contributes to gravity?

 

 

No. Relative energy does not contribute to gravity. The thing is, it's relative. If I were in a ship moving alongside of you, your relative kinetic energy would be zero. This would lead to a frame dependent gravitational field.

 

It's rest mass which contributes to gravity.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.