Nobrainer Posted October 17, 2012 Author Posted October 17, 2012 (edited) Question; If, as Stephen Hawkins believes, the entire universie was contained in something small but finite, smaller than a nutshell and today we have mass, energy and space and out of these three things one of them, space, is getting larger, expanding, then it does not take a genius to understand when there is a total of three things, finitely ordered and one of the threee is becoming greater then the other two somehow must be getting smaller. It is just common sense does it not? If not then why? If humidity is increasing around a puddle on the sidewalk on a sunny day then it makes sense that the puddle of water is decreasing as a function of evaporation. The evaporation rate is dependent upon the molecular actions, tempature, and the density of the humidity. If space is increasing in the universe then it makes sense that the decay actions of mass is causing it and the rate of decay is dependent upon the density of space around it. When eventually more and more physical evidense shows more and more abnormalities with space itself, then out of desperation physicists will finally become humble and realize their mistake. Edited October 17, 2012 by Nobrainer
Nobrainer Posted October 17, 2012 Author Posted October 17, 2012 (edited) Gravity has been misunderstood, the giants of old were essentially correct, there is a mechanical aspect of gravitation. 1). All mass and energy decay into gravitational waves 2). And these continually generated waves collide creating actions of amplitude increase with a different overall cebter of fhe wave abd and a reaction of the sources traveling to the least tension and move together to meet in the new 360 degree wavefront center. Edited October 17, 2012 by Nobrainer
Nobrainer Posted October 18, 2012 Author Posted October 18, 2012 (edited) When the James Chalis' and Christopher Huygens were working on the nature of the universe, it was a given that the universe was infinite, lasting forever, and therefore the criticism was based on a eternal universe and any energy given off would have been used up long ago or there had to be an infinite source. Today we know the universe is finite as in it has a finite starting point. This changes all the criticism involving a need for infinite energy. Energy is used and not infinite and therefore the universes expansion is costing finite energy to expand with a constant force. With this new way to rationalize the universe, overall time is a snapshot measure of this forward process. Edited October 18, 2012 by Nobrainer
Nobrainer Posted October 18, 2012 Author Posted October 18, 2012 (edited) To summarize; Time is a forward process because.... Time, space and gravitation are are actions of a forward process of mass and energy decaying into the gravitational wave and these waves forming fields by aligning and creating the reaction of gravitation by translating the amplitude action to the tension reaction of closing the distance between the wave generating objects. Edited October 18, 2012 by Nobrainer
Nobrainer Posted October 19, 2012 Author Posted October 19, 2012 Or the big bang created space as a monopole gravitational wave creation from the singularity through the big bang. Mass and energy still decay into the gravitational wave joining and creating more space. Stars energy replace magnetic fields as all mass and energy's magnetic fields decay into gravitational waves which in turn align mass and energy and join the existing aether creating a constant pulling force in the direction of the original big bang force. Gravity aligns mass through emitted wave synchronization and the gravitational waves combined to form a constant force in the original direction which was set in motion with the big bang. The reason time moves forward and is relative is because it is a function of decay of mass and it is hindered by the gravitational field energy density/ amplitude with in the local enviorment of the space that it is decaying into. Side note; The speed of light is constant because the small gravitational field of the photon synchronizes and obeys the laws of the emitted gravitational fields of the thicker enviorment the photon is advancing into. As long as a photon is plugged in, connected to it's source, it dies not appear to decay because the sources magnetic field continually replaces the magnetic field of the photon as it is decaying into gravitational waves.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now