unitspacetheory Posted September 24, 2012 Share Posted September 24, 2012 (edited) If Einstein can not explain physic phenomenons in microcosm ,then we have to find another way to do that. Outstanding question: *How is electron osscilated by radiation wave? *What is proper way to explain the properties of electron orbit around nucleus? *How micro particles don't fall straightly under gravitaton force? *What is cosmos status before big-bang even happen? * How is black-hole generated? please consider an ideal on blog : unitspacetheory.blogspot.com if it can be good direction Edited September 24, 2012 by unitspacetheory Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ajb Posted September 24, 2012 Share Posted September 24, 2012 (edited) You should really outline your ideas here rather than link off-site. Anyway, to adress your questions... *How is electron osscilated by radiation wave? You mean classical electromagnetic radiation? If so we have classical electrodynamics at our disposal. For example lots of effort has go into antenna theory. One can then also use quantum mechanics with a classical EM background or even quantum electrodynamics, depending on what you want to explain and in how much detail. *What is proper way to explain the properties of electron orbit around nucleus? Quantum theory. Again, it depends on the level of detail you need. The Schrodinger equation + perturbations works well, or you could go for the relativistic version in the first place- the Dirac equation. This is all well and fine for Hydrogen or even Helium, the trouble is when you have lots of electrons all interacting with each other. Numerical methods are now needed and you cannot get closed forms describing the orbitals. *How micro particles don't fall straightly under gravitaton force? You may have to be more specific here, I may be missing your point. However, the classical motion of test bodies in a gravitational field is well studied. In the context of general relativity particles follow "the straightest path possible" in 4d space-time. We also have a reasonable understanding of quantum field theory on curved space-times. *What is cosmos status before big-bang even happen? * How is black-hole generated? These two I put together, these questions are the "reverse" of each other. Classically we know how black holes collapse and we know how the Universe expands. The trouble is classically the mathematics tells us we have a singularity, which we can think of as a place in which our physics breaks down. Everything is okay as long as we are not very close to the singularity, which is at the centre of the black hole or the the "beginning" of the Big Bang. (If beginning is the right word.) These trouble really come down to the fact that we can no longer treat gravity as a classical force. Quantum effects of the gravitational field will become important at and near these singularities. As it stands we do not have a well-founded quantum theory of gravity and so cannot really understand the physics at classical singularities. The general consensus is that applying the rules of quantum theory to the gravitational field will regulate these singularities, that is remove them from the theory. We just don't really know how to apply these rules to gravity. So, your last two questions are generally open. Edited September 24, 2012 by ajb Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
swansont Posted September 24, 2012 Share Posted September 24, 2012 ! Moderator Note unitspacetheory, posting simply to advertise your blog is against our rules. You have been warned about this before; if you do it again you risk being banned as a spammer. The link has been removed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
unitspacetheory Posted September 24, 2012 Author Share Posted September 24, 2012 ! Moderator Note unitspacetheory, posting simply to advertise your blog is against our rules. You have been warned about this before; if you do it again you risk being banned as a spammer. The link has been removed. i wan to post directly very much but i can't post the equation that made by mathtype in here and all images also lost. my link just for reference before start for discusstion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
imatfaal Posted September 24, 2012 Share Posted September 24, 2012 ! Moderator Note unitspacetheory - this forum has full laTex implementation - just surround your code as follows[math] y=x^2[/math] becomes [math] y=x^2[/math]Also diagrams are postable either via a link (insert image 5th icon from right on tool bar) or by uploading ("attach this file" bottom of screen when using full editor) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jyutao Posted November 13, 2012 Share Posted November 13, 2012 I tried to give some explanation in my book "Unified Theory of Matter" about all these questions. If you are interested, please find the free version at the website below or email me to get a free copy. url removed -1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
swansont Posted November 13, 2012 Share Posted November 13, 2012 I tried to give some explanation in my book "Unified Theory of Matter" about all these questions. If you are interested, please find the free version at the website below or email me to get a free copy. url removed ! Moderator Note Hijacking and advertising are both against the rules. Discuss your proposal in its own thread, and only in that thread Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now