Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I'm such a newbie.  This only my second post on this site. So, my communications with the scientific-minded is very limited in time and depth. My opinions are hardly of extensive experience and educational discipline. Taking what think as a grain of salt mya be an overestimate of its worth. 

I've come to these forums as a result of trying to find a better fit than I've had on other forums. I am counting on this community to read my stuff and perhaps point me to where I might fit in. 

 

I have been having mind's-eye like data-flows resulting from imagination and meditation practices for 30-years. They have excited me, scared me, revealed to me and I can induce them, reduce and stop them, keep them secret, or try to process them. They often seem irrational, counter-intuitive or just hyper-imagainitive, assured. 

Thus far I believe I've said enough to push many scientific-minded folks away and this only an explanation of one way my stuff comes to me. 

How about you folks, is this too much too quick? Should I venture away?

Posted

I have been having mind's-eye like data-flows resulting from imagination and meditation practices for 30-years.

I have no idea what you mean. One of the key steps to being accepted and listened to is to be able to express yourself clearly. For me you fail totally in this quoted statement. Do you want to give it another try?

Posted
!

Moderator Note

Split from "Why are scientists seemingly reluctant to accept new ideas? " I have no earthy idea what to call it. I will change the title if pcalton (and only pcalton) has an appropriate suggestion

Posted

Logically, this thread will keep it's title.

Swansont says "I will change the title if pcalton (and only pcalton) has an appropriate suggestion"

However I also have an appropriate suggestion for the title which falsifies the clause that "only pcalton has an appropriate suggestion".

 

So there's no point in me telling you all what that suggestion might be.

Posted

It felt good to be out of the rain ;).

 

Pcalton, I have a feeling me and you are going to be good friends. As long as you reassure everyone that you are only brainstorming and trying to collaborate without pushing your own pet hypotheses, you will do fine here. Its worked for me anyways.

Posted

I have no idea what you mean. One of the key steps to being accepted and listened to is to be able to express yourself clearly. For me you fail totally in this quoted statement. Do you want to give it another

 

The mind's-eye sometimes called "third-eye, inner-eye, a sphere of thought, abstract thinking. When I meditate I picture stuff in my mind. The images often play out and conclude problems relating to science.

 

!

Moderator Note

Split from "Why are scientists seemingly reluctant to accept new ideas? " I have no earthy idea what to call it. I will change the title if pcalton (and only pcalton) has an appropriate suggestion

 

Sorry, I was looking for helpful input and failed to name it. I believe it's safe to say my ideas are out of the mainstream. You are welcome to give it a name and place it where you think the most appropriate.

 

It felt good to be out of the rain ;).

 

Pcalton, I have a feeling me and you are going to be good friends. As long as you reassure everyone that you are only brainstorming and trying to collaborate without pushing your own pet hypotheses, you will do fine here. Its worked for me anyways.

 

BINGO! You've said so well, thanks.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.