Martin Posted December 9, 2004 Posted December 9, 2004 today a Cambridge postdoc Daniele Oriti posted a paper http://arxiv.org/gr-qc/0412035 which links his line of research, the Spin Foams approach to quantum gravity, to the approach called Dynamical Triangulations there is evidently a convergence of non-string QG theories underway: DT, SpinFoam, Loop QG, Hawking path integral. oriti's paper is called The Feynman propagator for quantum gravity: spin foams, proper time, orientation, causality and timeless-ordering Oriti got his PhD in Quantum Gravity from Cambridge----i saw his thesis last year. It is interesting that he is still at Cambridge As I recall he was working with R. Williams who is an expert on discrete General Relativity, Regge calculus, that sort of thing IIRC.
Severian Posted December 9, 2004 Posted December 9, 2004 Oriti got his PhD in Quantum Gravity from Cambridge----i saw his thesis last year.It is interesting that he is still at Cambridge. That is actually a rather negative statement. One is usually discouraged from staying on at the same place, so the best people move on...
Severian Posted December 9, 2004 Posted December 9, 2004 I don't mean to steal your thunder, but how about a more interesting paper on gravity posted today: http://www.arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/0412109 "Lagrangian formalism of gravity in the Randall-Sundrum model"
Martin Posted December 9, 2004 Author Posted December 9, 2004 One is usually discouraged from staying on at the same place' date=' so the best people move on...[/quote'] I know! that is why I think it is interesting, because it doesnt follow the pattern. Of course I could be wrong in my estimation, but from the quality of the people he has published with, and his co-authored research, I dont think Oriti counts at all as a lightweight. so it is interesting to me that the pattern is broken. (there are a couple of possible explanations which I occur to me but are too speculatative to mention)
Martin Posted December 9, 2004 Author Posted December 9, 2004 I don't mean to steal your thunder, but how about a more interesting paper on gravity posted today:http://www.arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/0412109 "Lagrangian formalism of gravity in the Randall-Sundrum model" Please comment on it! Since it does not fall under the topic of this thread, dynamical triangulations, I started a new thread for it next door.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now