CarbonCopy Posted October 26, 2012 Posted October 26, 2012 When does an atom disintegrate into smaller ones and how can we predict the nature of radiation ( alpha, beta or gamma)
swansont Posted October 26, 2012 Posted October 26, 2012 When does an atom disintegrate into smaller ones and how can we predict the nature of radiation ( alpha, beta or gamma) It will disintegrate if there is a lower energy state available to it (that is allowable within the constraint of, and sometimes modified by conservation laws/selection rules). Generally the half life, within a decay type, will be shorter as the released energy increases. The type of radiation depends on the type of instability. Alpha happens (with a few notable exceptions) for nuclei that are very large; the instability is due to excess charge repulsion as compared to the nuclear attraction. Beta happens because of an excess or shortage of neutrons and there is a lower energy state available if a nucleon changes identity (best interpreted with the shell model). Gamma decay occurs when a nucleus is in an excited state.
CarbonCopy Posted October 27, 2012 Author Posted October 27, 2012 How do we know that an atom is at a lower energy ? And how do we know a nucleus is heavy ?
swansont Posted October 27, 2012 Posted October 27, 2012 How do we know that an atom is at a lower energy ? And how do we know a nucleus is heavy ? We know the energy is lower because total mass of the constituents has decreased. Large/heavy nuclei have large numbers of neutrons and protons in them. Alpha decay begins to be important above Z=82
Enthalpy Posted October 27, 2012 Posted October 27, 2012 Nuclei masses are measured with great precision in spectrometers. With an electric and a magnetic field, the deflection tells the mass with many places accuracy. Because energy in a nucleus is very concentrated, the variation of mass is significant and spectrometers observe it accurately. As a side remark, energy is always mass. Air blown by wind is heavier, water loses mass as it produces electricity in the dam, a stone is heavier hot than cold... But this variation is tiny, generally impossible to measure, and certainly the faint variation is not convenient for energy computations. Mass default is convenient, and commonly used, only for nuclear reactions like radioactivity.
O'Nero Samuel Posted October 31, 2012 Posted October 31, 2012 E"nergy is always mass?" Could you elaborate on that?
CarbonCopy Posted October 31, 2012 Author Posted October 31, 2012 mass energy conservation, Einstein's equation e=mc2.
Phi for All Posted October 31, 2012 Posted October 31, 2012 ! Moderator Note Nextstein, your post has been unapproved. Please don't hijack someone else's thread with your pet hypotheses. Also, speculation that isn't mainstream science should NOT be posted in mainstream sections, where students and other knowledge-seekers may confuse it with accepted theory. We have a Speculations section.Also, using one thread to advertise another thread isn't allowed. Please read the rules you agreed to when you joined. If you have a problem with them, or with this modnote, please report this post or PM another Moderator. Do NOT further derail this thread by commenting here.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now