Jesussm0kedweed Posted November 14, 2012 Share Posted November 14, 2012 (edited) After learning a little about the subject of dimensions and their perception, I felt that the views I had witnessed were not entirely correct. Could any of this be plausible? Which parts of this can be disproven? If there would be any way of proving any of this how would I go about doing it? This is what i have come up with using my limited knowledge of the subject. Basic Laws of dimensional existence 1: There are two types of dimensions: spatial (which is static) and temporal (which is dynamic) 2: every object must contain at least one single point in Order to exist 3: no object may exist in 2 or more non consecutive dimensions at any moment 4: any existing object also exists in every dimension prior to its current dimension Temporal dimensions (time) and spatial dimensions (space) are interwoven and constantly interacting with each other Spatial dimensions consist of a plane and it's contents. Spatial dimensions may only observe higher dimensions with the limits of their dimensional perceptions an may only observe phenomena of one dimension below them. With each new dimension comes more mass. More mass means more time dilation, therefore time slows (relatively of course) with each new dimension. Theoretically, at a certain dimension time could finally completely stop or even reverse itself. However this would go unnoticed by observers in thi theoretical dimension. So far this is mostly all I've got. Please comment, any corrections, thoughts, or confirmations are greatly appreciated. Edited November 14, 2012 by Jesussm0kedweed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ACG52 Posted November 14, 2012 Share Posted November 14, 2012 (edited) Put down the bong, and step away from your keyboard. 1. There are at least three spatial dimensions and one temporal dimension. If M-theory is correct, there are 10 spatial dimensions. 2. Seems a little self-evident. 3. Makes no sense. Dimensions are not higher or lower, or consective. They are all concurrent. You wouldn't say that the forward-back dimension is higher than the left-right dimension, or the up-down dimension. A dimension is a direction of movement. 4. All physical objects exist in all dimensions. However many there are. The rest doesn't mean much. Edited November 14, 2012 by ACG52 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jesussm0kedweed Posted November 14, 2012 Author Share Posted November 14, 2012 How are we able to observe other dimensions. From what I understand, shadows are 2 dimensional, but what about the first dimension. I also understand that the fourth dimension is too complicated for our minds to completely perceive, although we can make representations of what it looks like to us. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pcalton Posted November 15, 2012 Share Posted November 15, 2012 How are we able to observe other dimensions. From what I understand, shadows are 2 dimensional, but what about the first dimension. I also understand that the fourth dimension is too complicated for our minds to completely perceive, although we can make representations of what it looks like to us. At Universal City I rode on a ride that seemed 4D. As the screen had a 3D movie of what I would see riding a roller coaster while my seat shook and I got sprayed with mists of water. I just listened to a man speak, who some call him "Guru" say that when we die is when we realize that this world we are in is all fake. Perhaps there is a fourth demension or many deminsions for that matter. Maybe 4D+ is what remains after all that is fake is gone. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
truedeity Posted November 15, 2012 Share Posted November 15, 2012 in order to address dimension we must understand what it is not... it has been theorized that there are infinite parallel universes and every possibility of your life that could exist already exists we have come to a threshold in science where the answers we have been looking for, for thousands of years are staring us right in the face the question of the origins of consciousness is no longer a mystery, the inescapable fact is that consciousness and matter are interdependent aspects of each other it must be that one cannot exist without the other, so in a sense it is because of parallel universes that we have physical matter because it was not until consciousness existed that matter became physical parallel universes expresses the fact that all possibilities can exist and be infinite, this allows for consciousness to exist it is not until the moment of observation that the wave function collapses, and there it was the moment of consciousness became the moment of existence in the beginning there was nothing, the inconceivable nothing. then infinite possibilities of inconceivable nothing the existed, if only a single possibility that something could be observed exists matter would then have to exist so possibility itself is the reason why existence exists because there cannot be a possibility for inconceivable nothing because nothing cannot be dimensionless dimension or space is an inescapable fact of existence because inconceivable nothing is inconceivable therefore it is impossible therefore dimension must be observable because it is observable it has the possibility of being observed which introduces the existence of possibility, and because something is observable matter must exist but it cannot exist until the moment of observation but because the path to create something from nothing is inconceivable, something inconceivable is needed to explain it. amen Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
michel123456 Posted November 15, 2012 Share Posted November 15, 2012 (...) This is what i have come up with using my limited knowledge of the subject. Basic Laws of dimensional existence 1: There are two types of dimensions: spatial (which is static) and temporal (which is dynamic) (...) I have come to the conclusion that this must be wrong. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pcalton Posted November 18, 2012 Share Posted November 18, 2012 All deminsions are part of the whole. Separateness is nothing more than a maladaptive solution to a problem that doesn't exist. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now