Potential energy mass equivalency for an electric field

[Semjase]

Their seems to be two possible arguments for potential energy

mass equivalency.

 

1. An electric field has no mass and therefore has no mass energy

equivalency, but when the potential field does work it creates

new mass.

 

2. An electric field has mass, and therefore it transfers it's

it's mass to the particle it's doing work to.

 

A way to test for this would be to take an electron positron pair

and separate them by a distance in an electrically neutral

environment and let them accelerate towards each other

and testing for a mass change with a magnetic field.

 

This brings up a further question, would a change in

electric field strength without the magnetic component

would be felt instantaneously regardless of distance?

 

In the case of the electron positron pair test if

number 2 was the case, their mass would

have to remain constant because the field mass

and the electron mass make up the entire mass

of the electron.

 

Can we reach a consensus on this?

[Arnaud Antoine ANDRIEU]

Their seems to be two possible arguments for potential energy

mass equivalency.

 

1. An electric field has no mass and therefore has no mass energy

equivalency, but when the potential field does work it creates

new mass.

 

2. An electric field has mass, and therefore it transfers it's

it's mass to the particle it's doing work to.

 

A way to test for this would be to take an electron positron pair

and separate them by a distance in an electrically neutral

environment and let them accelerate towards each other

and testing for a mass change with a magnetic field.

 

This brings up a further question, would a change in

electric field strength without the magnetic component

would be felt instantaneously regardless of distance?

 

In the case of the electron positron pair test if

number 2 was the case, their mass would

have to remain constant because the field mass

and the electron mass make up the entire mass

of the electron.

 

Can we reach a consensus on this?

 

Hi,

 

It's exactly A very good point of view.

 

The English version : http://phys.org/news/2012-11-real-mystery-quantum-mechanics-physicists.html

The French version : http://www.sur-la-toile.com/discussion-240826-1-La-lumiere-a-la-lumiere-de-la-mecanique-quantique.html

 

 

In fact :

 

The Onde/Wave, is the field of particle.

 

and the field of particle (static mouvement), create this Onde.

 

In the following, we only have one's own entity, Because the Field and the Particule are The Same One !

This mean, Each of Those Case depends on, how long (time), and how do you look the While (distance/direction), and especially which alternance in sight do you pointer (aim) !!

 

 

 

This is my Perso-deduction since a lot of Months !

Step by step, we will get it, and above all,

I say the same "report" in France since January 2012, without changing One Sentence.

 

_____________________

 

for fun :

 

A Strange Beautiful Picture of decoherence from Benoit Mandelbrot at this link :

( This French Link, is the Fruit of the Very Long Story )

 

 

Picture-Link : http://www.sur-la-toile.com/discussion-238257-130-Le-big-bang-peut-il-reculer-...html

 

 

_____________________

 

 

After-specified the pattern of mine, try to Explain more or less the "Dual Onde Story" above.

 

Cordially.

Edited November 15, 2012 by Arnaud Antoine ANDRIEU

[swansont]

!

Moderator Note

Arnaud Antoine ANDRIEU, this looks to be hijacking and quite likely a candidate for a discussion speculations. Answers to questions should be based on accepted science, not your own formulation

—————

Their seems to be two possible arguments for potential energy
mass equivalency.

1. An electric field has no mass and therefore has no mass energy
equivalency, but when the potential field does work it creates
new mass.

2. An electric field has mass, and therefore it transfers it's
it's mass to the particle it's doing work to.

Electric fields are not actually real. That is enough reason to say they have no mass.

[Semjase]

An electric field is something but not actually real, what is it?

[swansont]

An electric field is something but not actually real, what is it?

It's a conceptual construct to help explain how charged particles behave.