Digital reality velocity ,space, time, mass , and distance

[Semjase]

Reality is digital, on the the large scale it appears analog, but

on the atomic scale it loses it's resolution and becomes digital.

This supported on the atomic scale by the fact that only certain

orbital sizes are allowed for an electron around a nucleus.

 

Velocity, space, time,distance and mass are all digital, this

is backed by the fact that all these have to be measured in

certain amounts and represented by a number. But certain amounts

represented by numbers also have amounts between these certain

amounts which are represented by irrational numbers. Irrational

numbers are undefined and therefore these irrational amounts

cannot exist which leads to a digital reality.

[swansont]

Reality is digital, on the the large scale it appears analog, but

on the atomic scale it loses it's resolution and becomes digital.

This supported on the atomic scale by the fact that only certain

orbital sizes are allowed for an electron around a nucleus.

Distance isn't quantized in orbitals, it's the energy and angular momentum. Quantized ≠ digital. They don't mean the same thing.

 

Velocity, space, time,distance and mass are all digital, this

is backed by the fact that all these have to be measured in

certain amounts and represented by a number. But certain amounts

represented by numbers also have amounts between these certain

amounts which are represented by irrational numbers. Irrational

numbers are undefined and therefore these irrational amounts

cannot exist which leads to a digital reality.

"Irrational numbers are undefined"? Um, no. For starters, pi and e are defined.

[Semjase]

Orbitals are represented a certain amount of possible

ones not an infinitely amount of possible ones which in it's self

indicates digital structure of reality.

 

e and pi cannot be represented by exact amounts

they can only be represented by increasing

degrees of precision.

 

I'd like to add this that e and pi are a theoretical concept

from analog mathematics that actually cannot be represented by a certain

amount in reality.

[swansont]

Orbitals are represented a certain amount of possible

ones not an infinitely amount of possible ones which in it's self

indicates digital structure of reality.

 

e and pi cannot be represented by exact amounts

they can only be represented by increasing

degrees of precision.

 

I'd like to add this that e and pi are a theoretical concept

from analog mathematics that actually cannot be represented by a certain

amount in reality.

Orbitals are not orbits.

 

e and pi are not "exact" but that's not the same as undefined. They are irrational. What of it?

[Semjase]

Let me look at the problem this way lets say that science way in the future

has finally found the fundamental building block of nature this building

block has finally proven to be indivisible, you now have a digital system.

If the system is truly analog you would be able divide amounts into

smaller and smaller quantities eventually I think that this will be proven

not to be the case.

[ACG52]

Let me look at the problem this way lets say that science way in the future

has finally found the fundamental building block of nature this building

block has finally proven to be indivisible, you now have a digital system.

If the system is truly analog you would be able divide amounts into

smaller and smaller quantities eventually I think that this will be proven

not to be the case.

 

 

So you're saying that if something way in the future is found, you're right.

 

Until then, if ever, you're wrong.

[swansont]

Discrete (quantized) and digital are still not the same thing.