ewmon Posted November 16, 2012 Posted November 16, 2012 I saw this and thought of it as a pretty cool "Eureka!" moment. Anyone care to comment? Also, do you know of a similar situation where the "problem" is originally/naturally viewed one way, but superior scientific insight results in a solution that's different? Abraham Wald is tasked with reviewing damaged planes coming back from sorties over Germany in the Second World War. He has to review the damage of the planes to see which areas must be protected even more. Abraham finds that the fuselage and fuel system of returned planes are much more likely to be damaged by bullets or flak than the engines. Question: What should he recommend to his superiors? Answer: Protect the parts that don’t have damage. Abraham Wald, a member of the Statistical Research Group at the time, saw this problem and made an unconventional suggestion that saved countless lives. Don’t armor the places that sustained the most damage on planes that came back. By virtue of the fact that these planes came back, these parts of the planes can sustain damage. If an essential part of the plane comes back consistently undamaged, like the engines in the previous example, that’s probably because all the planes with shot-up engines don’t make it back. Wald’s memos on this situation — in addition to being a remarkable historical statistical document — shed additional light on the statistics developed during the Second World War that would go on to found the field of Operations Research. source
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now