rusek Posted November 16, 2012 Posted November 16, 2012 (edited) On this forum I not have good relation with people who love Mr E I 'm sorry but in my experiments I explain 3 not the same method 1 geometry measure 2 Luminous Intensity 3 Foucault pendulums ( classical mechanic tool ) All three show the same resoult MR E repeat GALILEO MISTAKE http://tesla8.blogspot.com/ " Galileo postulated his relativity hypothesis: any two observers moving at constant speed and direction with respect to one another will obtain the same results for all mechanical experiments (it is understood that the apparatuses they use for these experiments move with them). In pursuing these ideas Galileo used the scientific method (Sec. 1.2.1): he derived consequences of this hypothesis and determined whether they agree with the predictions. This idea has a very important consequence: velocity is not absolute. This means that velocity can only be measured in reference to some object(s), and that the result of this measurment changes if we decide to measure the velocity with respect to a diferent refernce point(s). Imagine an observer traveling inside a windowless spaceship moving away from the sun at constant velocity. Galileo asserted that there are no mechanical experiments that can be made inside the rocket that will tell the occupants that the rocket is moving . The question ``are we moving'' has no meaning unless we specify a reference frame (``are we moving with respect to that star'' is meaningful). This fact, formulated in the 1600's remains very true today and is one of the cornerstones of Einstein's theories of relativity." Edited November 16, 2012 by rusek
John Cuthber Posted November 17, 2012 Posted November 17, 2012 Last time I checked the pendulum didn't have a lot to say about "luminous intensity". Are you sure you know what you are talking about?
rusek Posted November 17, 2012 Author Posted November 17, 2012 (edited) Last time I checked the pendulum didn't have a lot to say about "luminous intensity". Are you sure you know what you are talking about? three independent methods give the same fact I'm Idiot but You schould think how to fit Einstein equations to new discover. 1 Geometry of Light beam 2 Luminous Intensity of light beam >url removed 3 Classical mechanic very precission tool >url removed all work easy like my patents > url removed Edited November 17, 2012 by swansont remove links
swansont Posted November 17, 2012 Posted November 17, 2012 ! Moderator Note rusek,The purpose of this site is discussion. It is not here to provide links to your blog — this is a violation of rule 7. The links have been removed.
derek w Posted November 17, 2012 Posted November 17, 2012 So am I understanding this right,the Foucault pendulum,can be defined as an experiment that is stationary,and that the observer revolves around it?
John Cuthber Posted November 17, 2012 Posted November 17, 2012 From the point of view of an ant on the pendulum, it stays still and the world moves round it. However, if the ant sets up his own little pendulum it will show that he is moving. 1
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now