Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

No one says a cause of the Gravity directly.

This is one opinion.

origin-gravity.jpg

origin-gravity1.jpg

From what I can see, you just basically renamed gravity, which isn't a cause of gravity.

 

 

By Albert Einstein's theory of relativity, Gravity is a force caused by a mass affecting the space-time area, like using the fabric analogy. When an object is on a space-time fabric, there is an indentation in the fabric. This indentation is the area of gravity.

 

IF Inertia property is a cause gravity, here are the following questions:

 

 

 

 

Does Inertia properties affect time as well?

 

Is time the affect of inertia properties, where light photons are affected by this inertia property?

 

 

 

 

I'll think up more questions later.

 

 

Posted

 

Does Inertia properties affect time as well?

 

 

This is only the cause of gravity force.

Time dilation is another story.

More theoretical related equation research will be needed.

This concept says gravitation force does not have big difference than acceleration.

Without introduce graviton, we can easily explain gravitational phenomena.

 

 

Is time the affect of inertia properties, where light photons are affected by this inertia property?

 

We observed light is affected by gravity in the past experiment.

So light has very very thin inertia region around it.

Posted

This is only the cause of gravity force.

Time dilation is another story.

More theoretical related equation research will be needed.

This concept says gravitation force does not have big difference than acceleration.

Without introduce graviton, we can easily explain gravitational phenomena.

 

 

We observed light is affected by gravity in the past experiment.

So light has very very thin inertia region around it.

So you are saying that gravity does not affect space-time? This goes against what was recently tested, where they proved that Earth's gravity affects the space-time.

 

 

Other than that, let me think of more questions to ask.

 

 

Posted

So you are saying that gravity does not affect space-time? This goes against what was recently tested, where they proved that Earth's gravity affects the space-time.

 

 

Other than that, let me think of more questions to ask.

 

 

 

Relative theory does not say why space time deformation phenomena happen. The theory says the amount of space time deformation, and it's relations.

Posted

Relative theory does not say why space time deformation phenomena happen. The theory says the amount of space time deformation, and it's relations.

It says the space-time deformation phenomena occurs due to the mass of the object affecting the space-time fabric. It is just the property of matter and energy. Inertia properties would not be needed in this case.

Posted

It says the space-time deformation phenomena occurs due to the mass of the object affecting the space-time fabric. It is just the property of matter and energy. Inertia properties would not be needed in this case.

 

inertia breaking off = increase acceleration

Relative theory

increase acceleration ---> time dilation

Posted

inertia breaking off = increase acceleration

Relative theory

increase acceleration ---> time dilation

Okay, here is another question(s):

 

What causes the matter to emit this inertia field?

 

How do Black Holes carry out the same inertia properties?

 

 

 

 

 

Posted

Okay, here is another question(s):

 

What causes the matter to emit this inertia field?

 

How do Black Holes carry out the same inertia properties?

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current knowledge might be related to between mass and Higgs field.

More research will be needed.

If there were no upper limit, gravity force would be increased continuously with mass amount.

In the case of small Black Hole, the inertia breaking off property is concentrated in the small area.

Posted

Current knowledge might be related to between mass and Higgs field.

More research will be needed.

If there were no upper limit, gravity force would be increased continuously with mass amount.

In the case of small Black Hole, the inertia breaking off property is concentrated in the small area.

Also, is this Inertia property a property of space? Sorry for such a small question.

 

 

 

Posted

Also, is this Inertia property a property of space? Sorry for such a small question.

 

 

 

 

My link

I think empty space does not have no property, but has some basic properties.

Inertia is one of them.

 

In the past, we only thought inertia is only energy conservation form.

If so, how can we explain 'light travels the speed C'.

Posted

My link

I think empty space does not have no property, but has some basic properties.

Inertia is one of them.

 

In the past, we only thought inertia is only energy conservation form.

If so, how can we explain 'light travels the speed C'.

Okay, I have no more questions right now. I will think of more if I can.

 

[OFFTOPIC]Instead of me asking the questions here, maybe answer the PMs so this topic doesn't get overflown with questions[/OFFTOPIC]

 

 

 

Posted

This is a reason that mass must have it's inertia region.

If there were not such region, background basic field strength should be very very strong.

mass-inertia.jpg

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.