Structural Analysis instead of Calculus

[mishin05]

I already placed such subject on other site. But anybody can tell nothing!

I suggest to discuss's theme excerpts from this site

Edited November 26, 2012 by mishin05

[imatfaal]

Please post a summary or abstract of your ideas on the forum for members to read

[mishin05]

Please post a summary or abstract of your ideas on the forum for members to read

 

My link

[Bignose]

My link

 

No, I don't think you understand what you were being asked. You weren't asked to post another copy of the exact same link you already posted.

 

I, for one, don't click on links to websites I don't know and trust. This is how malware gets spread -- people post links that are randomly clicked one and then their computers are infected. I have zero interest on clicking on a random link, but I am interested in your reasons for saying that there are errors in calculus.

 

imatfaal is asking you to please copy and paste or re-type a summary or abstract of your work here -- on a website that I and others trust. That way we can also discuss it here as well.

[mishin05]

No, I don't think you understand what you were being asked. You weren't asked to post another copy of the exact same link you already posted.

 

I, for one, don't click on links to websites I don't know and trust. This is how malware gets spread -- people post links that are randomly clicked one and then their computers are infected. I have zero interest on clicking on a random link, but I am interested in your reasons for saying that there are errors in calculus.

 

imatfaal is asking you to please copy and paste or re-type a summary or abstract of your work here -- on a website that I and others trust. That way we can also discuss it here as well.

 

Well, I think, what this link is not infected:

http://www.mathisfun...hp?id=18422&p=3

Edited November 28, 2012 by mishin05

[overtone]

Well, I think, what this link is not infected:

Aside from that unsupported opinion, this thread has no topic. Do you plan to provide one?

[mishin05]

All right if don't want to read everything at once, I will spread in parts

[hypervalent_iodine]

!

Moderator Note

mishin05,

imatfaal was not asking you to provide us with more links. Could you please write something as a full post here instead of constantly linking people to external websites. This is more productive for discussion as it makes it easier to understand exactly what you're trying to say.

[mishin05]

The main reason for that in calculus there were mistakes consists in the following. When Rene Descartes created the Cartesian system of coordinates, he meant that setting one function on the horizontal line, and another on vertical, the width and length of the rectangle which area represents one more function are set.

The main mistake of founders of calculus in that that they badly studied: "Descartes's Rules for the Direction of the Mind".

Because when horizontal (OX) and vertical (OY) pieces that are postponed the rectangle turns out

 

. And the line of the schedule is only a part of drawing. Actually on graphics of function 9 functions are located but not one!

Euler decided to investigate some lines on one schedule that was a mistake. Instead of 9 functions began to investigate only one which was represented in the form of the line. But also it interpreted incorrectly having presented as function which postponed on the vertical line.

P.S.

I badly know English therefore I transport through the robot.

Edited November 29, 2012 by mishin05

[Bignose]

I badly know English therefore I transport through the robot.

 

Boy, you said it.

 

Doing integrals the way we currently are has been supremely successful. Can you show a specific example where it is shown to be wrong?

[mishin05]

Well, we will go some other way. Let Structural Analysis - addition to Calculus. Because applying it it is possible to describe all geometry as formulas. it will be so good?