Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

The plimsole seemed less convincing than the tape, which in turn was less than the cube - quality of the illusion, ease of shape, or the brain just getting used to being fooled?

Posted

I think it's the aspect ratio being so pronounced. The disparity of the actual shape vs its perceived shape grows continually smaller.

 

I printed out the cube. It works better if you close one eye and lose your depth perception, and I think it works well on camera for that same reason.

Posted

The close-up of the cube gives a tilt-shift effect (the focus along a horizontal line of pixels is the same regardless of the illusive 3d content of the scene). I think the brain accepts it as a camera effect and ignores it rather than trying to process actual depths from the focus. If you pause the video around 0:26 and stare at it blankly, the actual shape of the paper starts coming through a bit, as the depth cues don't match the perceived cube shape. The sides of the cube seem to bend outward toward the top. The top "near" corner seems to be pushed backward.

 

I think it works well on camera because the brain understands and handles camera effects, and doesn't strain to process them. Also, the camera carefully avoids horizontal movement, which would ruin the effect.

Posted

Agree with both above - I also printed out the cube; closing one eye suddenly made it better, and a good photo on an iphone was completely convincing (the little anomalies get blamed on the photo not the subject)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.