5614 Posted December 18, 2004 Posted December 18, 2004 nice... i get it, i wont spoil it for everyone else... quite clever... only the mathematicians will get it. same to you too!
bloodhound Posted December 18, 2004 Posted December 18, 2004 does anyone know what that constant is ? 2.71828. i dont get the point of writing sqrt (x^2) when x would just be sufficient. unless he wanted to introduce symmetry. i dont get the (1/y)^-1, when just y would be enough.
5614 Posted December 18, 2004 Posted December 18, 2004 well if you look at it like that he could have just written it out! its meant to be hard! one sec, bloodhound... do you not know what 2.71828 is?
bloodhound Posted December 18, 2004 Posted December 18, 2004 isnt there a letter missing? [edit] sorted. i should i thought in terms of words not symbols
5614 Posted December 18, 2004 Posted December 18, 2004 just outta interest does anyone else get it? and blike, did you understand it yourself??? just because you're doing some kinda microbiology, so i wouldnt have thought you would have.
Silencer Posted December 18, 2004 Posted December 18, 2004 I get the first line, and from that I can only assume what the second should be. It is pretty neat though. edit: nevermind, I get the second line now, the x was throwing me off.
Rakdos Posted December 18, 2004 Posted December 18, 2004 after reading it for the third time i get it its funny
budullewraagh Posted December 18, 2004 Posted December 18, 2004 a friend showed it to me the other day. got it quickly. the H2O was probably the most significant hint
AL Posted December 18, 2004 Posted December 18, 2004 Good one. only the mathematicians will get itYou don't need more than high school math to get it. the H2O was probably the most significant hintYou're kidding, right?
Phi for All Posted December 19, 2004 Posted December 19, 2004 That is good. And it's my wish to all of you brainy-types out there.
budullewraagh Posted December 19, 2004 Posted December 19, 2004 You're kidding, right? got me to thinking about the nature of the writing. since it was in a jovial christmas-ish tone, it prepared my brain to think of such a topic
Jordan14 Posted December 19, 2004 Posted December 19, 2004 I had to read it a few times. But yes I get it
Ophiolite Posted December 19, 2004 Posted December 19, 2004 Once I recalled there is something called joined up writing it fell into place.
Cap'n Refsmmat Posted December 19, 2004 Posted December 19, 2004 It took me a while, but I get it now. Good one.
Perennial Posted December 19, 2004 Posted December 19, 2004 A cool one ! What was the original source?
5614 Posted December 19, 2004 Posted December 19, 2004 http://www.neowin.net/forum/uploads/post-287-1101922357.gif is the original site of the image
Cap'n Refsmmat Posted December 19, 2004 Posted December 19, 2004 It's a Fox Trot cartoon. Someone scanned it onto Neowin.
coquina Posted December 19, 2004 Posted December 19, 2004 I got it. Very good. Think I'll send it to the physicist's I work with.
NSX Posted December 20, 2004 Posted December 20, 2004 What's the point of the H2O? ho ho ho? Or is it because Santa's looking @ the snow? ^o) else: i think it was good, though they should have written 2.71828... actually, they should have written "Limit n->Inf (1 + 1/n)^n" That would've been more fun.
folder Posted December 20, 2004 Posted December 20, 2004 My physics teacher puts a fact of the day on the board each day and he put that on the board last Thursday.
bloodhound Posted December 20, 2004 Posted December 20, 2004 lim n tends to inf of (1+1/n)^n is too recognisable... what about lim n tends to inf of (1+1/(n-3))^(n+10)
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now