grayfalcon89 Posted December 19, 2004 Posted December 19, 2004 Prove that any five consecutive integer is divisible by 5 such that the least term is > 0. Prove that any two integer's sum is NOT always divisible by 3. State why this is and tell in what case is this possible. Prove that: [math]\binom {n}{k}[/math] equals [math]\binom {n}{n-k}[/math]
matt grime Posted December 19, 2004 Posted December 19, 2004 the first question makes no sense. i think the word produc is missing. the third one is obvious from the definition.
bloodhound Posted December 19, 2004 Posted December 19, 2004 for the second one i dont even know what there is to prove actually. 0 + 0 anyone?
JaKiri Posted December 19, 2004 Posted December 19, 2004 I presume the 2nd one refers to 'consecutive integer'. Let us set our numbers as x (divisible by 3), x+1 and x+2. For example, 3, 4 and 5. x+1 + x+2 = 2x+3, divisible by 3. However, any sum involving the multiple of 3 cannot be divisible by 3, because you end up with either 2x+1 or 2x+2. Re: the first one, Basically it's the same answer as the 2nd one. Taking 5 consecutive numbers, one MUST be divisible by 5, and thus so must the product. It's fairly clear where this assertion comes from.
matt grime Posted December 19, 2004 Posted December 19, 2004 0+0=0 which is divisible by three, bloodhound. I dont' see why the "general" disproof was offered, since it only requires one counter example, eg 0+1. i'm also mystified as to why the original 1st question limits us by some positvity condition - if the question is to make sense there is no reason for this.
bloodhound Posted December 19, 2004 Posted December 19, 2004 0+0=0 which is divisible by three' date=' bloodhound. I dont' see why the "general" disproof was offered, since it only requires one counter example, eg 0+1. [/quote'] yes sorry, i meant exactly that. i should have made that a bit clear hehe.
Primarygun Posted December 20, 2004 Posted December 20, 2004 Prove that any five consecutive integer is divisible by 5 such that the least term is > 0. For 5 con. integer, the reminder is 1,2,3,4,0 = 1,2,-2,-1,0 ( By definition of mod ) Or Sum of reminder = 1+2+3+4+0= 10 which is divisible by 5 [Two approach]
Primarygun Posted December 23, 2004 Posted December 23, 2004 Prove that any two integer's sum is NOT always divisible by 3. State why this is and tell in what case is this possible. Let x and y be two integers So x+y=3n ( n : integer) (x+1)+y=3a (a: integer) [Math]---> 3(n-a)=1 [/ Math] [Math]--->n-a=1/3 [/ Math] Do it with (x+2)----> n-a=2/3 Since n and a are integers , the different of them is integers. ----------->Not the sum of any two integers is divisible by 3. The sum of two integers is divisible by 3 occurs when the sum of the two reminders of the integers is divisible by 3.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now