Semjase Posted December 18, 2012 Posted December 18, 2012 This is the most important alien contact with the human race, it is with the Plejaren people who Semjase is a member, They are a peace loving race who have had peace on their planet which is in the Pleiades star system, for 50,000 years, the caucasian race on our planet has it's roots from their star system. 1800 pages of contact reports, of recorded conversations with them is available on a pdf download at the following web page. http://www.helirods.net/apps/documents/ Here are some images related to them The Plejaren alphabet A laser gun Semjase by her ship Semjase doing a flight demonstration in her ship The Plejaren peace symbol
Moontanman Posted December 18, 2012 Posted December 18, 2012 Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence... What you present as evidence is horse feathers...
Semjase Posted December 19, 2012 Author Posted December 19, 2012 If you read the contact reports carefully you will find the body of evidence overwhelming. Here are some further images Asket is the women who is a related race to the Plejaren, notice her lower forward placed ear lobes Plejaren man in space suits A ship at close range
Moontanman Posted December 19, 2012 Posted December 19, 2012 I thought your name looked familiar... Semjase, this stuff was horse feathers 40 years ago (when i was really into UFOs), it is horse feathers now, and 40 years from now it will still be horse feathers... It smacks of racism, tries to elevate Caucasians above everyone else on the earth, makes the impossible assertion that humans and life forms from another world can interbreed, that in of it's self falsifies the entire idea, it's an outdated hoax that tried to appeal to the idea that white people are somehow special, nearer to the angels, and the old guy who took the pics was hoaxer, his space ships were clunky and not very realistic...
Ringer Posted December 19, 2012 Posted December 19, 2012 It's amazing the rendition of their alphabet's sounds isn't using the international phonetic alphabet, and instead seems to just use the many of the words for the proto-Canaanite letters. This would kind of suggest this construction wasn't done by professional linguists. Which means it's probably just something someone put together to make it look legitimate.
Semjase Posted December 19, 2012 Author Posted December 19, 2012 Here's a comparison between the Plejaren alphabet and the Hebrew alphabet.
Moontanman Posted December 19, 2012 Posted December 19, 2012 Here's a comparison between the Plejaren alphabet and the Hebrew alphabet. And your point would be what?
Semjase Posted December 19, 2012 Author Posted December 19, 2012 A smoking gun. I like to add that Plejaren scientist named Sejasa took a native earth women Eve and fathered the caucasian race as refered to in the bible 13000 years ago and as mentioned in the contact reports by Semjase. To further complicate the story Jesus was fathered by a man from their star system who actually was Jmmanuel who later became known as Jesus, his life was recorded 2000 years ago, and the scrolls were found and translated into English and be viewed here. talmud.pdf
Moontanman Posted December 19, 2012 Posted December 19, 2012 A smoking gun. I like to add that Plejaren scientist named Sejasa took a native earth women Eve and fathered the caucasian race as refered to in the bible 13000 years ago and as mentioned in the contact reports by Semjase. To further complicate the story Jesus was fathered by a man from their star system who actually was Jmmanuel who later became known as Jesus, his life was recorded 2000 years ago, and the scrolls were found and translated into English and be viewed here. Exactly what has the gun been smoking? 3
Semjase Posted December 19, 2012 Author Posted December 19, 2012 Since their home planet Erra is 500 light years away their ships have the technology to break the light barrier where matter becomes tachyon particles, in reality matter dematerializes and becomes imaginary matter as predicted by the Gamma equation if light barrier is broken, matter then rematerializes when you slow down below light speed. This same effect makes time travel to the future and the past possible which they are capable of safely.
Moontanman Posted December 19, 2012 Posted December 19, 2012 Since their home planet Erra is 500 light years away their ships have the technology to break the light barrier where matter becomes tachyon particles, in reality matter dematerializes and becomes imaginary matter as predicted by the Gamma equation if light barrier is broken, matter then rematerializes when you slow down below light speed. This same effect makes time travel to the future and the past possible which they are capable of safely. Semjase, i suggest you read the rules, even in speculations you have to back up your claims and you are not providing anything but unsupported claims as evidence, such claims are not evidence...
Semjase Posted December 19, 2012 Author Posted December 19, 2012 Without faster than light travel how would any space travellers be able leave thier world and traverse great distances in space and return to their own world near the date they left instead of in a different century. Faster than light speeds have already been observed experimentally. And time travel is a new field of research.
Moontanman Posted December 19, 2012 Posted December 19, 2012 Without faster than light travel how would any space travellers be able leave thier world and traverse great distances in space and return to their own world near the date they left instead of in a different century. Well for that to be significant you would first have to establish that alien space ships actually exist but to travel between stars can be accomplished by generational slow ships... Faster than light speeds have already been observed experimentally. Evidence please... And time travel is a new field of research. Evidence please...
Semjase Posted December 19, 2012 Author Posted December 19, 2012 Observed faster than light speeds. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/841690.stm Time travel research. http://phys.org/news63371210.html http://www.dailymail.co.uk/home/moslive/article-1269288/STEPHEN-HAWKING-How-build-time-machine.html
Moontanman Posted December 19, 2012 Posted December 19, 2012 (edited) Observed faster than light speeds. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/841690.stm No not really... The group velocity of a light pulse depends upon the mixture of frequencies within the pulse and the medium through which it travels. It need not be the speed of the pulse itself. The important thing, however, is that whilst the group velocity can be manipulated to be faster than the speed of light, it is not possible to use this effect to send information faster than the speed of light. Time travel research. http://phys.org/news63371210.html No evidently not... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ronald_Mallett ObjectionsIn a paper by Ken Olum and Allen Everett[8] the authors claimed to have found problems with Mallett's analysis. One of their objections is that the spacetimewhich Mallett used in his analysis contains a singularity even when the power to the laser is off and is not the spacetime that would be expected to arise naturally if the circulating laser were activated in previously empty space. Mallett has not offered a published response to Olum and Everett, but in his bookTime Traveler he mentions that he was unable to directly model the optical fiber or photonic crystal which bends the light's path as it travels through it, so the light circulates around rather than moving in a straight line; as a substitute he chose to include a "line source" (a type of one-dimensional singularity) which would act as a "geometric constraint", bending spacetime in such a way that the light would circulate around on a helix-shaped path in a vacuum[9] (for an older solution involving an infinite cylinder which creates CTCs, in this case due to the cylinder's own rotation rather than light circulating around it, see theTipler cylinder). He notes that closed timelike curves are present in a spacetime containing both the line source and the circulating light, while they are not present in a spacetime containing only the line source, so that "the closed loops in time had been produced by the circulating flow of light, and not by the non-moving line source."[10] However, he does not provide any additional argument as to why we should expect to see closed timelike curves in a different spacetime where there is no line source, and where the light is caused to circulate due to passing through a physical substance like a photonic crystal rather than circulating in a vacuum due to the curved spacetime around the line source. Another objection by Olum and Everett is that even if Mallett's choice of spacetime were correct, the energy required to twist spacetime sufficiently would be huge, and that with lasers of the type in use today the ring would have to be much larger in circumference than the observable universe. At one point Mallett agreed that in a vacuum the energy requirements would be impractical but noted that the energy required goes down as the speed of light goes down. He then argued that if the light is slowed down significantly by passing it through a medium (as in the experiments of Lene Hau where light was passed through asuperfluid and slowed to about 17 metres per second) the needed energy would be attainable.[11] However, the physicist J. Richard Gott argues that slowing down light by passing it through a medium cannot be treated as equivalent to lowering the constant c (the speed of light in a vacuum) in the equations of General Relativity, saying:[12] One has to distinguish between the speed of light in a vacuum, which is a constant, and through any other medium, which can vary enormously. Light travels more slowly through water than through empty space, for example, but this does not mean that you age more slowly while scuba diving or that it is easier to twist space-time underwater. The experiments done so far don't lower the speed of light in empty space; they just lower the speed of light in a medium and should not make it easier to twist space-time. Thus, it should not take any less mass-energy to form a black hole or a time machine of a given size in such a medium. Later, Mallett abandoned the idea of using slowed light to reduce the energy, writing that, "For a time, I considered the possibility that slowing down light might increase the gravitational frame dragging effect of the ring laser ... Slow light, however, turned out not to be helpful for my research."[13] Finally, Olum and Everett note a theorem proven by Stephen Hawking in a 1992 paper on the Chronology Protection Conjecture,[14] which demonstrated that according to General Relativity it should be impossible to create closed timelike curves in any finite region that satisfies the weak energy condition, meaning that the region contains no exotic matter with negative energy. Mallett's original solution involved a spacetime containing a line source of infinite length, so it did not violate this theorem despite the absence of exotic matter, but Olum and Everett point out that the theorem "would, however, rule out the creation of CTC's in any finite-sized approximation to this spacetime."[edit]R http://www.dailymail.co.uk/home/moslive/article-1269288/STEPHEN-HAWKING-How-build-time-machine.html You really didn't read this one did you? Edited December 19, 2012 by Moontanman
Semjase Posted December 19, 2012 Author Posted December 19, 2012 You missed the point mainstream physics is interested in time travel. http://mkaku.org/home/?page_id=252
Moontanman Posted December 19, 2012 Posted December 19, 2012 You missed the point mainstream physics is interested in time travel. http://mkaku.org/home/?page_id=252 Being interested is not the same as doing it...
ACG52 Posted December 19, 2012 Posted December 19, 2012 Is Speculations the right forum for outright insanity?
Semjase Posted December 19, 2012 Author Posted December 19, 2012 All these images didn't come out of thin air, The contact reports have a lot of scientifically verifiable information, for example they mentioned that universes are created by the creation in matter and antimatter pairs. I know of no other way to make charged particles except by pair creation, why is there no antimatter in this universe. Is there an example of science creating charged particles by anything other means than by pair creation?
Ophiolite Posted December 19, 2012 Posted December 19, 2012 Trash can please. Inventive and creative nonsense would have the benefit of being entertaining. This is as entertaining as a painting the toe nails of a dead hippo.
John Cuthber Posted December 19, 2012 Posted December 19, 2012 This is the most important alien contact with the human race, it is with the Plejaren people who Semjase is a member, They are a peace loving race who have had peace on their planet which is in the Pleiades star system, for 50,000 years, the caucasian race on our planet has it's roots from their star system. 1800 pages of contact reports, of recorded conversations with them is available on a pdf download at the following web page. http://www.helirods.net/apps/documents/ Here are some images related to them The Plejaren alphabet A laser gun Semjase by her ship Semjase doing a flight demonstration in her ship The Plejaren peace symbol The peace symbol has the CND logo the wrong way up. So it no longer reads as N D in semaphore but UD or CE. Very careless of them. It's easy to compile a bunch of nonsense but include some real science (like pair creation) then say "it must be true- it has real science in it". Copying a few facts doesn't make it real. Copying an alphabet badly isn't difficult either ; it doesn't prove anything . Wondering about time travel isn't a "new field of research" and it wasn't when HG wells did it. "I like to add that Plejaren scientist named Sejasa took a native earth women Eve and fathered the caucasian race as refered to in the bible 13000 years ago" Well, since the bible says 6000 years ago and reality (you know- actual scientific evidence) says that there were people 200,000 years ago then the idea of 13,000 years being either correct or even WhatItSaysInTheBible is absurdly wrong.
Semjase Posted December 19, 2012 Author Posted December 19, 2012 Adam and Eve was a story in the bible, where they were created by God as specified by the date in the bible, According to the Plejaren they were not created by God but Eve was a native earth women who birth to Adam with the union of Eve and their scientist Semjasa 13000 years ago. The crediblity of the Plejaren hinges on the fact they can see probalistic possibilities in the future. They have predicted plate shiftting in the pacific ocean which will lead to a horseshoe shaped tsunami from northern California to northern Washington. They have mentioned December 21 2012 as the problem date and further research on the subject which has lead to one factor that could account for that prediction which is the pole shift that will potentially occur on that date.
Moontanman Posted December 19, 2012 Posted December 19, 2012 Adam and Eve was a story in the bible, where they were created by God as specified by the date in the bible, According to the Plejaren they were not created by God but Eve was a native earth women who birth to Adam with the union of Eve and their scientist Semjasa 13000 years ago. The crediblity of the Plejaren hinges on the fact they can see probalistic possibilities in the future. They have predicted plate shiftting in the pacific ocean which will lead to a horseshoe shaped tsunami from northern California to northern Washington. They have mentioned December 21 2012 as the problem date and further research on the subject which has lead to one factor that could account for that prediction which is the pole shift that will potentially occur on that date. Well then in two more days we'll know if this is true or bullshit... exactly when was this prediction made?
Semjase Posted December 19, 2012 Author Posted December 19, 2012 Here's the video from where the prediction comes from. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZqT6QOxaxbQ
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now