michel123456 Posted December 29, 2012 Author Share Posted December 29, 2012 What else is there to plot? nothing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
swansont Posted December 29, 2012 Share Posted December 29, 2012 nothing. Yes. What was the point of the question? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
michel123456 Posted December 29, 2012 Author Share Posted December 29, 2012 --------------------- In other words, we consider that at some definite time, spacetime is empty except for that we can observe. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
swansont Posted December 29, 2012 Share Posted December 29, 2012 --------------------- In other words, we consider that at some definite time, spacetime is empty except for that we can observe. There are things too far away to observe (not causally connected to us), but otherwise, yes. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
michel123456 Posted December 30, 2012 Author Share Posted December 30, 2012 (edited) There are things too far away to observe (not causally connected to us), but otherwise, yes. Thank you. --------------------- In other words, we consider that at some definite time, spacetime is empty except for that we can observe. And if (IF) they were objects that filled spacetime, instead of being empty, those objects would be unobservable. Edited December 30, 2012 by michel123456 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
swansont Posted December 30, 2012 Share Posted December 30, 2012 Thank you. And if (IF) they were objects that filled spacetime, instead of being empty, those objects would be unobservable. Unless they are invisible, no. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
michel123456 Posted December 30, 2012 Author Share Posted December 30, 2012 (edited) Unless they are invisible, no. I know it is hard to swallow. Please take some time rethinking the picture. I am at t=0 observing a universe that spread along the diagonal d=ct. After 1 year i am at t=1 observing the same universe that spread along the diagonal d=ct and so on at t=2 again the same universe collated upon d=ct The observable objects of the observed universe travel through time on a parallel path to me. I observe constantly the same universe. The superposition of all diagrams t=0, t=1, t=2 fill the entire spacetime diagram. Till here we must have an agreement. But At any time, between t=0 and t=1, what are we traveling into ? _The answer is; we are traveling in spacetime. IOW we are traveling in a supposedly "empty" spacetime where there is "nothing' else than d=ct observable objects. (you seemed to agree on this) Now, i am arguing that one can fill the whole diagram with 'other' objects that will follow a parallel path to us but with a gap in time. I am arguing that those "other" objects would be unobservable. Even not from a picture from T=minus 1. Because at T=minus1 we were observing objects on the d=ct diagonal. I am offering you a new denser Universe. Edited December 30, 2012 by michel123456 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
swansont Posted December 30, 2012 Share Posted December 30, 2012 I know it is hard to swallow. Please take some time rethinking the picture. I am at t=0 observing a universe that spread along the diagonal d=ct. After 1 year i am at t=1 observing the same universe that spread along the diagonal d=ct and so on at t=2 again the same universe collated upon d=ct The observable objects of the observed universe travel through time on a parallel path to me. I observe constantly the same universe. The superposition of all diagrams t=0, t=1, t=2 fill the entire spacetime diagram. Till here we must have an agreement. But At any time, between t=0 and t=1, what are we traveling into ? _The answer is; we are traveling in spacetime. IOW we are traveling in a supposedly "empty" spacetime where there is "nothing' else than d=ct observable objects. (you seemed to agree on this) Now, i am arguing that one can fill the whole diagram with 'other' objects that will follow a parallel path to us but with a gap in time. I am arguing that those "other" objects would be unobservable. Even not from a picture from T=minus 1. Because at T=minus1 we were observing objects on the d=ct diagonal. I am offering you a new denser Universe. What you are doing is equating an object's spacetime coordinates with its distance from you. They aren't the same thing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
michel123456 Posted December 30, 2012 Author Share Posted December 30, 2012 What you are doing is equating an object's spacetime coordinates with its distance from you. They aren't the same thing. Exactly. Object's spacetime coordinates should have nothing to do with mines. What (i am arguing) is happening is that I am scanning only the d=ct part of the universe. If the universe is traveling at the same pace that I do, I continuously scan the same objects. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
michel123456 Posted December 31, 2012 Author Share Posted December 31, 2012 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now