Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Many things in our universe interact, and that is why we gain knowledge by making inferences from our observations. Nobody has immediate observation of anything except their own mind.

 

You can also question the nature of "knowing." Scientists know things reasonably well because they can test their claims. However, people think of untestable claims all the time. A great example is the claim "I think, therefore I am." To some people, that is the only unconditional statement they can make with certainty.

Maybe natural selection conditioned us to think up certain untestable ideas. We just can't know they're true in the sense that a scientists knows things are true. Of course, many religious people claim to "know" with great "certainty" that "God" "exists".

Edited by Mondays Assignment: Die
Posted

Yes, our brains and consciousness will limit us if we think that there is no knowledge to be had except via mentation. There is also knowledge by identity, which Aristotle reasoned would be the only form of true knowledge. Hence 'Cogito'. But my guess is that there is no such limit and we can know whatever can be known. The Upanishads tell us, 'the Unknown is not the Unknowable', and I have come to trust this old text.

 

.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.