Arnaud Antoine ANDRIEU Posted March 12, 2013 Author Posted March 12, 2013 In conclusion, my theory can build a universe with just one hypothetical particle. It simulates static density (density matrix) by the vector Q.
Arnaud Antoine ANDRIEU Posted March 22, 2013 Author Posted March 22, 2013 http://www.nature.com/news/planck-telescope-peers-into-the-primordial-universe-1.12658 http://www.decodedscience.com/the-latest-from-cern-its-a-higgs/27154
Mike Smith Cosmos Posted March 22, 2013 Posted March 22, 2013 In conclusion, my theory can build a universe with just one hypothetical particle. It simulates static density (density matrix) by the vector Q. Where did this one particle come from ?
Arnaud Antoine ANDRIEU Posted March 24, 2013 Author Posted March 24, 2013 Where did this one particle come from ? Of nowhere. This hypothetical particle is therefore a simulated oscillation energy. Since this is a hypothetical particle that simulates the vector Q of the Energy sea - Dirac sea - Energy Wave(s) . Where the graviton come from? This is the same question. This particle does not exist. It's only hypothetical. Other questions? http://www.physik.uni-kl.de/aeschlimann/?mode=publications#submitted
SplitInfinity Posted March 24, 2013 Posted March 24, 2013 Of nowhere. This hypothetical particle is therefore a simulated oscillation energy. Since this is a hypothetical particle that simulates the vector Q of the Energy sea - Dirac sea - Energy Wave(s) . Where the graviton come from? This is the same question. This particle does not exist. It's only hypothetical. Other questions? Question...since you are detailing your model using geometry that is specific to our Space/Time Universal understanding...your detailed Universe and it's geometry must be created or generated by the existence of some Quanta that would be responsible for mass...no? Split Infinity
Arnaud Antoine ANDRIEU Posted March 24, 2013 Author Posted March 24, 2013 Question...since you are detailing your model using geometry that is specific to our Space/Time Universal understanding...your detailed Universe and it's geometry must be created or generated by the existence of some Quanta that would be responsible for mass...no? Split Infinity Yes of course. May be one day we can explain it through the Higgs boson.
SplitInfinity Posted March 24, 2013 Posted March 24, 2013 Yes of course. May be one day we can explain it through the Higgs boson. Question again...since Quantum Particle/Wave Forms cannot exist in 1, 2,3,4, and probably more Universal Dimentionality...how can your model work? Split Infinity
Arnaud Antoine ANDRIEU Posted March 24, 2013 Author Posted March 24, 2013 (edited) For my part I expressed in terms of static density to the Density Operator in the density matrix . More passages energy wave in the same point, greater the mass will be "hard" or "dense". Question again...since Quantum Particle/Wave Forms cannot exist in 1, 2,3,4, and probably more Universal Dimentionality...how can your model work? http://www.scienceforums.net/topic/70425-quanta/ Edited March 24, 2013 by Arnaud Antoine ANDRIEU
SplitInfinity Posted March 24, 2013 Posted March 24, 2013 For my part I expressed in terms of static density to the Density Operator in the density matrix . More passages energy wave, the greater the mass will be hard. Tell me this just to reaffirm....what is the Space/Time dimensionality of this model? Split Infinity I am having a hard time accepting a One Quantum Particle/Wave Form Universe as I am fairly certain this is not possible. Split Infinity
Arnaud Antoine ANDRIEU Posted March 24, 2013 Author Posted March 24, 2013 Tell me this just to reaffirm....what is the Space/Time dimensionality of this model? Schrödinger equation
SplitInfinity Posted March 24, 2013 Posted March 24, 2013 For my part I expressed in terms of static density to the Density Operator in the density matrix . More passages energy wave in the same point, greater the mass will be "hard" or "dense". http://www.scienceforums.net/topic/70425-quanta/ i do not believe that Linear Time could even exist in such a Universal Construct. Split Infinity
Arnaud Antoine ANDRIEU Posted March 24, 2013 Author Posted March 24, 2013 Linear? The clock turn on. Hence the oscillation
SplitInfinity Posted March 24, 2013 Posted March 24, 2013 Linear? The clock turn on. Hence the oscillation If Quanta exist...thus Particle and Wave as well as the Space/Time Geometry to necessitate frequency. Split Infinity
Arnaud Antoine ANDRIEU Posted March 24, 2013 Author Posted March 24, 2013 If Quanta exist...thus Particle and Wave as well as the Space/Time Geometry to necessitate frequency. Yes. to call it energy
SplitInfinity Posted March 24, 2013 Posted March 24, 2013 Yes. to call it energy So again...what am I looking at here for Universal Space/Time Geometry? Split Infinity
SplitInfinity Posted March 24, 2013 Posted March 24, 2013 my solution LOL! Your Killing me! LOL! Not trying to bust you but how can this Particle/Wave Form even EXIST in your model? Split Infinity -1
Arnaud Antoine ANDRIEU Posted March 24, 2013 Author Posted March 24, 2013 The concept of matter waves http://www.scienceforums.net/topic/72357-the-concept-of-matter-waves-can-it-create-strings-theory/
SplitInfinity Posted March 24, 2013 Posted March 24, 2013 The concept of matter waves http://www.scienceforums.net/topic/72357-the-concept-of-matter-waves-can-it-create-strings-theory/ Now you are talking about minimum 10 or 11 Dimensional Space/Time Geometry. How does this jive with your model? Split Infinity
Arnaud Antoine ANDRIEU Posted March 25, 2013 Author Posted March 25, 2013 (edited) Now you are talking about minimum 10 or 11 Dimensional Space/Time Geometry. How does this jive with your model? My topic is related to the dissymmetry flow of energy. To trace or draw the energy I am using charts. Energy is seen as a single dimenssion and with several levels. I do not want to talk about decoherence or mass, but simply the mechanics of the circulation synergistic energy. (the diagram above is only an example of chart, because the energy is not measured in db) Edited March 26, 2013 by Arnaud Antoine ANDRIEU
SplitInfinity Posted March 27, 2013 Posted March 27, 2013 When I look at this model I am not looking at a state of Singularity or as you have stated that it would be...a One Dimensional Universe able to have a single particle exist. These statements are contradictions. Split Infinity
Arnaud Antoine ANDRIEU Posted March 27, 2013 Author Posted March 27, 2013 When I look at this model I am not looking at a state of Singularity or as you have stated that it would be...a One Dimensional Universe able to have a single particle exist. These statements are contradictions. Split Infinity Normal, it will call the Quantum Entanglement http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_entanglement There are several canonical entangled states in theory
Arnaud Antoine ANDRIEU Posted April 1, 2013 Author Posted April 1, 2013 no ? To archive ---> http://iopscience.iop.org/1367-2630/14/10/103003/article
Arnaud Antoine ANDRIEU Posted April 18, 2013 Author Posted April 18, 2013 The only explanation is the superluminal speed energy between matter and antimatter.Source = AehDistance = rWith Planck time:Speed or frequency of the fluctuation of the energy from the sourceof emission and the emitted matter - following by the emitted matter toit's source of origine Ef = (tp r²) + (tp √r) Once the charge consumed (matter) the energy goes back at it's source Aeh to pick up a new load.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now