Jump to content

What is cause of autosomal dominant phenotypes? only gain-of-function?


noopdeloop

Recommended Posts

Disease can be transmitted in an autosomal recessive, autosomal dominant or X-linked fashion or arise de novo. I want to understand the case of a mutation that may either be autosomal recessive (homozygous or compound heterozygote i.e. one mutation in the gene from mom and a different mutation in the same gene from dad) or autosomal dominant. I’ve seen that autosomal dominant sometimes turns out to be gain of function. That means the protein might form complexes with the wildtype protein to make an overall dysfunctional complex or its hyperactive in some way and that gives rise to a disease phenotype. But most disease arising from a single gene seems to require both gene copies to be knocked out by mutation. So, my question is, is autosomal dominant pretty much always assumed to arise due to a gain-of-function effect. OR can it just be that the half the protein pool is knocked out and the disease phenotype arises because you really need the full ‘dose’ of protein. OR its rate limited in a pathway, so having only half of it debilitates the system enough to give a phenotype. I would probably imagine in this case that the protein is so important, that knocking both copies out would be lethal to the organism. So, my question is, does autosomal dominant always imply gain of function or should one also consider the possibility of insufficient protein levels giving rise to the phenotype?

 

thanks

noopdeloop

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So, my question is, does autosomal dominant always imply gain of function or should one also consider the possibility of insufficient protein levels giving rise to the phenotype?

 

No, they don't always imply gain-of-function. They can result in haploinsufficiency. Also, mutations can be described using various terms, which appropriately describe their effect on function.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muller's_morphs

 

For loss of function mutations, there are two terms. amorphic (complete loss of function) and hypomorphic(partial loss).

 

For gain-of function mutations, there are three terms. hypermorph (increase in function), antimorph (acts antagonistically to the wild-type protein) and neomorph (novel function that is different to wild type function).

 

dominant mutations can be amorphic or hypomorphic in nature.

 

You missed out a number of modes of inheritance, mt, holandric, X-linked-dominant male lethal, co-dominance, etc.

Edited by jp255
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.