Ivan Tuzikov Posted February 5, 2013 Posted February 5, 2013 Let’ssuppose that Big Bang was prepared and initiated by some “Creator” in otherUniverse and that our Universe is located within it being a smaller part of it. Is it theoreticallypossible to “create” in such a way several completely identical Universes withidentical future and evolution? I mean is it theoretically possible that aeonsago somewhere existed the same Universe as ours with the same creatures andliving beings and with the same events? Thanks in advance.
Arch2008 Posted February 5, 2013 Posted February 5, 2013 Alan Guth, who posed inflation as the mechanism that expanded the universe, thinks that creating another universe is a distinct possibility. He reasons that the synthetic universe would start to inflate and then separate from ours. Thus it would not be "a smaller part of it". If one universe can be created then an infinite number would also be possible. With an infinite number of universes, the subset of universes exactly like our own would also be infinite. However, since these universes would be separate from our own, we could never interface with them and speculation about them would not be subject to scientific scrutiny. Dobrii dyen!
Ivan Tuzikov Posted February 5, 2013 Author Posted February 5, 2013 Alan Guth, who posed inflation as the mechanism that expanded the universe, thinks that creating another universe is a distinct possibility. He reasons that the synthetic universe would start to inflate and then separate from ours. Thus it would not be "a smaller part of it". If one universe can be created then an infinite number would also be possible. With an infinite number of universes, the subset of universes exactly like our own would also be infinite. However, since these universes would be separate from our own, we could never interface with them and speculation about them would not be subject to scientific scrutiny. Dobrii dyen! Good evening! I have a few more theoretical questions. 1. Why synthetic universe would separate from the parent-universe where the "creator" dwells? 2. Why we could never interface with the parent-universe? 3. Can "creator" or humans eventually meet each other?
Mike Smith Cosmos Posted February 5, 2013 Posted February 5, 2013 Good evening! I have a few more theoretical questions. 1. Why synthetic universe would separate from the parent-universe where the "creator" dwells? 2. Why we could never interface with the parent-universe? 3. Can "creator" or humans eventually meet each other? 1. There is the question of the colossal amount of energy required by the "creator" compared with a) our universe and b) us. Thus we would need to become separate from both the "creator" and the "creators" dwelling universe. 2. Perhaps we could with a certain amount of protection or metamorphosis . 3. As per point 2
Lazarus Posted February 5, 2013 Posted February 5, 2013 I prefer the Day and Night of Brahm where the universe expands and contracts continuously. There is no reason that our universe is the only one. Like we are no longer the center of the universe with the sun and stars rotating around us. The equation called Roulette did a good job of predicting how the sun and planets rotated around us. I don't think that proved the sun rotates around the earth. I also don't thing the good and valid equations of Relativity prove the universe is screwy and incomprehensible.
Ivan Tuzikov Posted February 6, 2013 Author Posted February 6, 2013 “Alan Guth,who posed inflation as the mechanism that expanded the universe, thinks thatcreating another universe is a distinct possibility.” OK, in suchcase, is it possible for the “Creator” to prepare everything before Big Bang insuch a way, that It will be able to predict the future of any particle orliving being? And will It be able to purposefully create another identicalUniverse (considering It can make everything in such a way that the otherUniverse will be same as the first one). You see,the point is that a colleague of mine believes in the omniscience of God. Andif we replace the notion “God” with the notion “Creator”, I see the only way toimplement such omniscience as to create a Universe # 1, observe every singleevent and then create a Universe # 2 (by organizing identical Big Bang). My colleaguelikes to philosophize and I try to find some physical rationale for theoreticalpresumptions. TIA.
Arch2008 Posted February 6, 2013 Posted February 6, 2013 The energy that sparked the Big Bang was about what you would get from a kilogram of matter. The amount of negative pressure stuff needed to coax inflation into making a new universe is less than that. We still don't know how to actually do these things, but that is what the math indicates. The energy for all the stars came when the Superforce separated into the four fundamental forces. Your friend believes that an omnipotent being created the universe exactly the way it is today. Is this plausible? Sure, that's what omnipotent means. Some very great scientists have asked if the universe is just a science experiment, which would of course require an experimenter. I believe that science governs the universe and that God should help us to govern ouselves.
Spyman Posted February 6, 2013 Posted February 6, 2013 IF our Universe is a simulated reality program running inside a powerful computer, then a "Creator" could more than likely copy and run several identical programs or stop and restart one single program several times.Omniscience could then also be achieved by making the program deterministic and presetting the initial conditions or by regulary pausing the program and adjust the parameters before restarting from an earlier timestamp such that it continues on right track.The Simulation Argument: Why the Probability that You Are Living in a Matrix is Quite High
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now