Jump to content

Thread hijack - Is the Standard Model consistent with current observation?


rwjefferson

Recommended Posts

speak for your self.101

You over-complicate self-evident truth with alpha-numeric ba-bel. You'll never know how gravity works if you continue to refuse even try recognize quantum pressure differential and quantum vacuum pressure.


What is the point of hubris and hostility and ignorance and power? What is the point of a standard model of physics that fails to predict gravity and evolution and topspin lift? What is the point of propagating dogma in the Name of science? What is the point of another innocent mind blinded by dogma?


quantum gravity.007

Force is inertial pressure differential. Attraction is reaction in verse vacuum pressure. Earth's atomsphere is filled with interactive massive baryonic particles and space is filled with weakly interactive massive quantum particles. Matter accelerates toward lower pressure and matter is e=mc2.


Extraordinary claims demand extraordinary proof. Observations indicate Hoover and Higg's and weak nuclear and Van der Waal's and gravity are consistent with state of attraction.


Kindly prove beyond a reasonable doubt that gravity and Van der Waal's and weak nuclear and Higg's are not consistent with vacuum pressure or fore ever hold your peace .


ItS

peace

r~


vortex is the tango between newton and bernoulli
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.