Discussing alternate theories to dark matter

[Semjase]

Discuss any alternate theories to any role dark matter

is theorized to be responsible in this universe.

 

There's another possible explanation for the missing

gravity besides dark matter is the fact that the magnetic field

of the galaxy has been mapped and the galaxy resembles a

low height large diameter cylindrical magnet with the super massive

black hole at the center of the galaxy setting up the entire magnetic

of the galaxy.This binds together all celestial objects with magnetic

fields together in the galaxy, and this could account for the missing gravity.

 

Here's a magnetic field map of the Galaxy

 

http://www.nrl.navy.mil/media/news-releases/2012/scientists-chart-high-precision-map-of-milky-ways-magnetic-fields

[John Cuthber]

That is a theory, to exactly the same extent that everything is magnetic (which isn't a very great extent).

[Semjase]

Dark matter's resultant dark energy is theory considered

for the increased velocity of expansion of the universe, I'm

proposing a more rational idea for the increasing velocity

of the universe.

The theory is a follows -

The universe today can be modeled as series of shells

one within each other, a shell can be looked at a charged

hollow sphere where the electric field inside the sphere is

zero the same can be said for a universe shell where the

gravitational force acting on a body inside the shell will be

minimal from the shell. The density of mass on the outer

shell of the universe is less than an inner shell,which is the case

in any explosive event. The only thing that slows the expansion of the

universe is the shell acting on it's shelf,therefor the inner shell slows

it's expansion velocity faster than the outer shell, due to the closer

distances between mass in the inner shell opposed to the outer shell.

This effect gives the illusion of the universe expanding at an increasing

rate of velocity, in reality then inner part of the universe's expansion velocity

is slowing at a greater rate than the outer part of the universe's expansion velocity.

If we could look back past the location of the big bang we could determine if this

theory is right or not at that point the universe's expansion would appear to be slowing,

if the universe was in a continual increase of the expansion velocity this would not be the case.

To simplify this it boils down to the fact that the force of gravity slowing the expansion velocity

increases as you move towards the inside fringes of the inner part of the universe.

Edited February 19, 2013 by Semjase

[jajrussel]

Would spectroscopy defy the illusion or support it?

[John Cuthber]

Well, over the years we have done lots of spectroscopy. And nobody saw a problem with those results and the established theory.

 

Incidentally, someone needs to explain to Semjase what the word "Theory" means in a scientific context.

It does not mean "unsupported ramblings".

[Semjase]

I've found support that the acceleration of the

universe might just be an illusion from this researcher

 

http://www.nbcnews.com/id/44690771/ns/technology_and_science-science/t/accelerating-universe-could-be-just-illusion/#.USP9qPJzeM0

 

Maybe someone could decipher from this article or other information about research

that led to the discovery of what appears to be an accelerating universe and say if my theory is feasible.

 

http://www-supernova.lbl.gov/PhysicsTodayArticle.pdf