The global Warming conspiracy

[joeman]

Global warming is
caused by the earth's orbit around the sun destabilizing. People take
the earth’s magnetic field for
granted, because it can't be detected by our five senses (sight, sound,
taste, smell, feel, etc). It can only be detected by the knowledge that
magnetic
fields exist, or a magnetometer, or a compass.The earth’s magnetic, and
gravitational fields
protects all life on the surface of this planet from the sun by holding
the earth in a stable orbit around the sun, and holds the moon in a stable
around the earth. It protect life on this planet from
deadly high velocity solar winds. The earth's magnetic, and
gravitational
fields also protect life from the harshness of surrounding universe, and
It performs several other functions. It holds this planet together, holds
life, objects, and the ocean to the surface of this planet. It retains the air
we breathe, and keep it from escaping into space, it protects life on this
planet from sun flares, deadly radiation, from poisonous gases, and the vacuum
of the surrounding universe, and It acts as a force shield. The electromagnetic
of the Aurora Borealis, and Australis Borealis is responsible for our
weather such as, thunderstorms, snowstorms,
hurricanes, tornadoes, and wind in the lower atmosphere. These are all
generated by electromagnetic, and / or magnetic activity. The rotating
magnetic body of the earth functions like a generator's armature it also
generates electromagnetic, and magnetic energy, and is responsible for
the jet stream in the upper atmosphere. Electromagnetic energy is generated,
when the earth's magnetic field brushes against the magnetic field of the
surrounding universe, because the earth's magnetic field repels the universe's
magnetic field. These electromagnetic, and magnetic forces move the air in
earth's upper, and lower atmosphere. Air can't move on its own.


The earth is moving closer to the sun, because the earth's magnetic field is
weakening. In the future it will get too hot to go outside in the day time,
during the summer months. The winters are going to become warm, and /
or sunny, and the warmer the winters, the hotter the summers. Greenhouse gases
can't cause the sun to shine in winter, and greenhouse gases can't create
sunny, and warm winter days. Purportedly, greenhouse gases only absorb solar
infrared irradiance, which is purported to raises the earth surface
temperature. In the future people will turn to all manners of lawlessness, even
cannibalism to survive. The inclement weather, temperatures, and
climate will severely disrupt the world's food production, and food
supplies. This is some of the apocalyptic events the people on this planet
will face in the future, if the earth orbit isn't stabilized in time. I believe
the anomalies below are affecting the earth's weather, temperature, and
climate, not greenhouse gases. The sun is going to end all life on
this planet slowly, If global warming isn't reversed in time. The instruction to
reverse global warming, and stabilize the earth's orbit is written below.
Global warming, and orbital destabilization are going to cause apocalyptic
events in the future, if not reversed in time.







The anomalies
below were discovered by American scientific organizations such as NASA, USGS,
NOAA, SOHO, etc, and not by me. I am the one who put these anomalies together as
evidence that proves the earth's orbital around the sun is destabilization, and
decaying. Keep in mind that these anomalies are in the beginning stages. I
started researching this subject in May-1982 I been involved with
global warming since July-1983. I am not an over night expert. The
anomalies below are occurring simultaneously, and are slowly worsening. There
is no information available to show how long earth's orbit around the sun have
been destabilizing, or which one of these anomalies below will cause death, and
destruction, first. I pray the anomalies below help you see the big picture, and the truth. Something is going wrong with the earth's orbit, and the earth itself.The articles, and
scientific websites below are my references. They support my assertions

THE ANOMALIES

(1). The earth is developing a breach in its magnetic fields. The earth's
magnetic field is showing signs of collapsing. This anomaly will produce deadly
events in the future. click on.

REFERENCES:

Dr. Tony Phillips. "Giant Breach in Earth's
Magnetic Field Discovered." Science@ NASA. December 16, 2008.

Jennifer Rumburg. "The Sun-Earth Connection: Heliophysics Solar Storm
and Space Weather - Frequently Asked Questions." NASA Headquarters

David G. Sibeck is the THEMIS Project Scientist
at NASA�s Goddard Space Flight Center in Greenbelt,
MD. Marit Øieroset is the lead
author of one of two papers on this research, entitled "THEMIS
multi-spacecraft observations of magnetosheath plasma penetration deep into the
dayside low-latitude magnetosphere for northward and strong B_y
IMF," published in May 2008 in Geophysical Research Letters
and is a THEMIS researcher at the University
of California, Berkeley. Jimmy Raeder is a THEMIS
co-investigator at the University
of New Hampshire. Wenhui
Li is a THEMIS researcher at the University
of New Hampshire and
author of a paper on this research, entitled "Cold dense
magnetopause boundary layer under northward IMF: Results from THEMIS and MHD
simulations," in the Journal of Geophysical Research.


(2). The earth magnetic, and gravitational fields has weaken by 10% since
the 19th century, and is continuing to weaken. This anomaly will produce
deadly events in the future. Copy, and paste website to search engine.

REFERENCES:

Roach, John (2004); National Geographic News;

from:news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2004/09/0909_040909_earthmagfield.html.


Bridges, Andrew (2003); Earth's Magnetic Field Weakens 10 Percent; from:
www.space.com/scienceastronomy/earth_magnetic_031212.html.



· Geomagnetism &
Paleomagnetism background material. American Geophysical Union
Geomagnetism and Paleomagnetism Section.

· National Geomagnetism Program. United States Geological Survey,
March 8, 2011.

(3). The earth has shifted on its axis by an additional 26 degrees beyond
normal, and the
tilting of the earth axis is worsening. This anomaly has altered the
chandler's wobble. The chandler's wobble has increase in dimensions, and
position. And the reversal of earth's magnetic field, and the
chandler's wobble coincide with the shift in earth's axis.

I live in the southern part of the northern hemisphere. That's in the

southern part of America. We are now experiencing sunny warm winter, due
to the additional 26 degree shift in earth axis. we have more sunny
warm days, than cold weather. All of this evidence proves the earth has
shifted on it axis from 23.5 to 49.5 degrees, and that a 26 degree
difference. This anomaly will accelerate the melting in the north pole, and cause deadly events in the future.



REFERENCES:

Earth Planets Space, 2010, v. 62, No. 12, 943-947

Milankovitch, M. 1920. Theorie Mathematique des Phenomenes Thermiques produits
par la Radiation Solaire. Gauthier-Villars Paris.



Copy, and paste to search engine



(A). www.michaelmandeville.com/.../chandler_wobble_plots.htm.



(B). http://www.columbia.edu/itc/ldeo/v1011x-1/jcm/Topic2/Topic2.html



(C).http://divulgence.net/axis%20shift%202.html.

(D).http://www.divulgence.net/

 

(4). The earth's magnetic poles are continuing to reverse at 40 miles per
year. This correlate with the 26 degree additional shift in earth's
axis. Click on.

REFERENCES:

Reading: Fowler Ch 8, p373-381
Glatzmaier et al. Nature 401, 885 - 890 1999


Merrill, Ronald T.; McElhinny, Michael W.; McFadden, Phillip L. (1996). "Chapter 8". The magnetic field of the earth: paleomagnetism, the core, and the deep mantle. Academic Press. ISBN 978-0-12-491246-5.


World Data Center for Geomagnetism, Kyoto. "Magnetic North, Geomagnetic and Magnetic Poles". Retrieved 2012-07-03.
North Magnetic Pole Moving East Due to Core Flux, National Geographic, December 24, 2009


(A).http://science.nasa.gov/science-news/science-at-nasa/2003/29dec_magneticfield/

(B).http://www.nasa.gov/vision/earth/lookingatearth/29dec_magneticfield.htm

©.http://www.psc.edu/science/glatzmaier.html

(5). The earth's rotation is continuing to slow down. Due to the earth tilting
on its axis. Click on.

REFERENCES:

Jenkins GS (1996) A sensitivity study of changes in Earth’s rotation
rate with an atmospheric general circulation model. Global Planet Change 11: 141–154

Hunt BG (1979) The influence of the Earth’s rotation rate on the
general circulation of the atmosphere. J Atmos Sci 36: 1392–1408

Del Genio AD, Suozzo RJ (1987) A comparative study of rapidly, and slowly
rotating dynamical regimes in a terrestrial general circulation model. J
Atmos Sci 44: 973–986

(A).http://novan.com/earth.htm

(B).http://bowie.gsfc.nasa.gov/ggfc/tides/intro.html.



(6). The earth is wobbling on its axis, and the wobbling is continuing to
worsen. This is due to the earth shifting on its axis by an additional 26 degrees. Click on

REFERENCES:


Earth Planets Space, 2010, v. 62, No. 12, 943-947

Earth Planets Space, Vol. 62 (No. 12), pp. 943-947, 2010
doi:10.5047/eps.2010.11.002

copy, and paste to search engine


(A). http://www.technologyreview.com/view/415093/earths-chandler-wobble-changed-dramatically-in-2005/

(B). http://poleshift.ning.com/profiles/blogs/a-new-earth-wobble-that-we-are

©.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chandler_wobble

(D). http://www.physorg.com/news/2012-01-earth-mantle-shown-high-pressure.html

(7). The moon is continuing to move away from the earth 3.8 cm per year. Click
on website (2A) read last sentence in figure10. I don't know the total
distance the moon has traveled away from the earth, at this point. Click
on.

REFERENCES:


Bender, P. L., The Lunar Laser Ranging Experiment, UCSD

McDonald, Kim (April 26, 2010). "UC San Diego Physicists Locate Long Lost Soviet Reflector on Moon". UCSD. Retrieved 27 April 2010.

James G. Williams and Jean O. Dickey. "Lunar Geophysics, Geodesy, and Dynamics" (PDF). ilrs.gsfc.nasa.gov. Retrieved 2008-05-04. 13th International Workshop on Laser Ranging, October 7–11, 2002, Washington, D. C.

(A).http://www.uni.edu/morgans/astro/course/Notes/section4/new17.html.

(B).http://blogstronomy.blogspot.com/2009/11/is-moon-moving-away-from-earth.html.

(8). The sun is getting hotter, and brighter in summer. Either the sun is
getting larger, or earth is moving closer to the sun, I believe its the
latter. The sun to blame for global warming.This anomaly will produce
deadly events in the future. click on.


REFERENCES:

Naomi Oreskes and Erik M. Conway (2010). Merchants of Doubt, Bloomsbury Press, pp. 8-9.

Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union / Volume 2004 /

Issue IAUS223 / June 2004, pp 605-606

Active Cavity Radiometer Irradiance Monitor (ACRIM) solar irradiance monitoring 1978 to present (Satellite observations of total solar irradiance); access date 2012-02-03

Ineson S., Scaife A.A., Knight J.R., Manners J.C., Dunstone N.J., Gray L.J., Haigh J.D. (9 October 2011). "Solar forcing of winter climate variability in the Northern Hemisphere". Nature Geoscience 4 (11): 753–7. Bibcode 2011NatGe...4..753I. doi:10.1038/ngeo1282

"Russian academic says CO2 not to blame for global warming". Russian International

News Agency. 15 January 2007.
Retrieved 24 August 2012. "Global warming
results not from the emission of greenhouse gases [...], but from an unusually
high level of solar radiation and [...] growth in its intensity."

Baliunas, Sallie; Willie Soon (22 August 2002). "Global

Warming Science vs. Computer Model Speculation: Just Ask the Experts".
Capitalism Magazine. Retrieved

Anderegg, William R L; James W. Prall, Jacob Harold, and Stephen H. Schneider (2010). "Expert

credibility in climate change". Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 107
(27): 12107–9. Bibcode 2010PNAS..10712107A. doi:10.1073/pnas.1003187107.
PMC 2901439. PMID 20566872.

(A).http://www.appinsys.com/GlobalWarming/GW_Part6_SolarEvidence.htm.

(9). The ice in the arctic is being melted by the sun during each polar ice
capssummer season, due to addition 26 degree shift of the earth axis.. The
oceans are rising. One polar ice cap melting will not flood the planet,
both ice caps will. Click on.

(A).http://arstechnica.com/science/2012/08/arctic-ice-cap-set-for-record-breaking-summer-melt-session/

If Crude oil, and natural gas (O&G) doesn't sustain the high temperature, and pressures in the

core, then what was O&G created for? Why large quantities O&G by-products are discharged

during volcanic activity? Oil, and gas wells are the earth’s fuel system, volcanoes are the

earth exhaust system. The core is its engine, and the oceans are it cooling system. That’s how

earth’s systems functions. The O&G extraction process used by the oil companies prevents

O&G form being forced in to the core to be ignited. The O&G enter into the lower mantle as

flames, heat, and pressure, there by heating the outer core, which heats the inner core, and the

inner core generates earth magnetic, and gravitation fields.


The lack of O&G into the core causes the core to cool, and the pressure to drop, and weakens

the earth's magnetic field. Earth's magnetic, and gravitational fields are weakening, causing

the earth orbit around the sun to destabilize.



The earth is a magnetic, and gravitational field generator. The earth's magnetic, and

gravitational fields, and the orbital movement around the sun are the mechanisms that

keep the earth in a stable orbit around the sun. Many people don't want you to know this. My


life could be in danger.

Edited February 20, 2013 by joeman

[SamBridge]

So let me get this straight: you originally thought the sun didn't cause warming effects?

Edited February 21, 2013 by SamBridge

[Cap'n Refsmmat]

 

(3). The earth has shifted on its axis by an additional 26 degrees beyond

normal, and the

tilting of the earth axis is worsening. This anomaly has altered the

chandler's wobble. The chandler's wobble has increase in dimensions, and

position. And the reversal of earth's magnetic field, and the

chandler's wobble coincide with the shift in earth's axis.

I live in the southern part of the northern hemisphere. That's in the

southern part of America. We are now experiencing sunny warm winter, due

to the additional 26 degree shift in earth axis. we have more sunny

warm days, than cold weather. All of this evidence proves the earth has

shifted on it axis from 23.5 to 49.5 degrees, and that a 26 degree

difference.

This anomaly will accelerate the melting in the north pole, and cause deadly events in the future.

I take it every amateur astronomer on the planet has noticed how the sky suddenly appears very different?

[menageriemanor]

So after more than 30 years studying this subject, you can't see the yawning craters of logic in your thinking? Every astronomer on the planet in cahoots with communist democrats? What's the theory? All scientists paid off by sunglass manufacturers and sun screen companies to not state the bleedin' obvious? It would be very easy to see the difference in the night skies. What is your explanation?

[CaptainPanic]

Scifi is short for "Science fiction". It is important that although "Science" gives it a rather official sound, "fiction" is the real clue as to what you're dealing with.

 

This is certainly meant to be on topic.

[swansont]

I take it every amateur astronomer on the planet has noticed how the sky suddenly appears very different?

 

Astronomers? With a change of 26 degrees everyone should notice. But I'm below 49 degrees of latitude and haven't seen the sun directly overhead yet.

[joeman]

So let me get this straight: you originally thought the sun didn't cause warming effects?

What I'm saying earth orbit around the sun is destabilizing, cause the temperature to rise.

General blog advertising removed

 

I take it every amateur astronomer on the planet has noticed how the sky suddenly appears very different?

Then, they should agree that the earth's orbit around the sun is destabilizing.

General blog advertising removed

 

Scifi is short for "Science fiction". It is important that although "Science" gives it a rather official sound, "fiction" is the real clue as to what you're dealing with.

 

This is certainly meant to be on topic.

I'm happy you think so, let you, and I debate, if you dare. I have been involved with geophysics, and global warming since July-1983. I have no time for fun, and games, or science fiction.

 

I have scientific evidence for everything I say, do you? If I fail all life on this planet will perish, and this is not science fiction, sir.

 

So after more than 30 years studying this subject, you can't see the yawning craters of logic in your thinking? Every astronomer on the planet in cahoots with communist democrats? What's the theory? All scientists paid off by sunglass manufacturers and sun screen companies to not state the bleedin' obvious? It would be very easy to see the difference in the night skies. What is your explanation?

Simple diatribe.

Edited February 21, 2013 by Phi for All
Non-specific advertising links removed

[Ophiolite]

If you are correct then this would clearly be a very serious situation. Therefore it is your responsibility to convince the public at large and the membership here of the truth of your assertions. With that in mind please address each of these points.

 

1. If the Earth's orbit has been destabilised and the axis has changed by 26 degreees, why has this not been noticed by anyone?

 

2. By what mechanism does the weakening of the magnetic field - soemthing that has happened many times in Earth history - destabilise the Earth's orbit.

 

3. By what mechanism does a change in axial rotation rate induce a change in orbit?

 

4. What evidence do you have that the sun is getting nearer? If it is, why does the moon still manage to block out the sun during a solar eclipse?

 

5. Oil and natural gas are not formed in the core? What makes you think they are?

[CaptainPanic]

I have scientific evidence for everything I say, do you? If I fail all life on this planet will perish, and this is not science fiction, sir.

 

Ok, this is so ridiculous that I know you are essentially trolling.

But I love trolls, so I will bite. So, let me get this straight... you are really claiming that the axis around which the earth rotates has moved by 26 degrees from 23.5 to 49.5 degrees. Right?

 

Would you agree that, if this were true, logically the Tropic of Capricorn and the Tropic of Cancer would have to move? In other words, at midsummer, the sun should be exactly straight overhead at a different location now than in the past.

 

And also, that logically the Arctic circle and Antarctic circle would have to move? At midwinter, the sun should just touch the horizon at those lines, but with a changed axis, this would be a different location.

 

That is my "evidence". What is yours?

[joeman]

Astronomers? With a change of 26 degrees everyone should notice. But I'm below 49 degrees of latitude and haven't seen the sun directly overhead yet.

 

 

There is no direct proof that the earth has shifted on it axis by an additional 26 degrees, but there is indirect evidence:

 

(1). The chandler's wobble has not only has change position it has change dimension. See polar movement 1909-2001

 

http://www.columbia.edu/itc/ldeo/v1011x-1/jcm/Topic2/Topic2.html

http://geophysics.ou.edu/solid_earth/notes/precess/chandler.html

 

 

 

(2). Earth magnetic field is moving. This movement coincides with the 26 degree additional shift in earth's axis.

 

http://science.nasa.gov/science-news/science-at-nasa/2003/29dec_magneticfield/

 

http://divulgence.net/axis shift 2.html.

[swansont]

There is no direct proof that the earth has shifted on it axis by an additional 26 degrees, but there is indirect evidence:

 

ROFLMAO

 

Seriously, there can be indirect evidence but not direct evidence of something that is naked-eye observable? Are you effing kidding me?

[CaptainPanic]

Seriously, there can be indirect evidence but not direct evidence of something that is naked-eye observable? Are you effing kidding me?

 

You can observe with the naked eye that he is most probably kidding you.

[SamBridge]

What I'm saying earth orbit around the sun is destabilizing, cause the temperature to rise.

(url removed by mod)

I'm not getting it though. The title says global warming is a conspiracy or fake, yet the destabilizing of Earth's orbit would provide yet more evidence that the sun can heat it up more. Anyway, Earth's orbit has made gradual changes for the last 4-5 billion years, why would it all of a sudden become unstable? The rate that Earth's rotation slows down or destabilizes is so insignificantly small we won't have to change our calenders for it for at least 1000 years, and that's something that more than just climatologists looked at, studies like astronomy and even the business realm could be interested in that.

[joeman]

I been involved with geophysics, and global warming since July-1983, I'm now 60 years old. when I was a teenager the hottest part of the day was twelve noon, now the hottest part of the day is 3-5 o'clock in the after noon. This is due to the earth's rotation slowing down, and the rotation of the earth is continuing to slow down.

 

I was born in Houston, Texas. Houston. Texas is in the southern part of the northern hemisphere. when I was a teenager Houston had cold temperature in winter, with temperatures well below freezing. As of 10 years ago Houston's weather has been sunny, and warm. And today 2013 Houston winter's is sunny, and warm for the most part. This is due to the 26 degree addition shift in earth's axis. The southern part of the northern hemisphere is facing towards the sun, due to the 26 degree additional shift in earth's axis.

 

Read my blog (url removed by mod). Something is going wrong with the earth, and its orbit around the sun.

Edited February 21, 2013 by CaptainPanic
You have advertised your blog enough already.

[SamBridge]

Yeah I've also noticed winters getting warmer in the northern hemisphere

 

.

 

Something is going wrong with the earth

 

. Climatologists have been saying that for years, but they haven't said much about the Earth's axis.

Edited February 21, 2013 by SamBridge

[swansont]

You can observe with the naked eye that he is most probably kidding you.

 

I want to be generous and assume this is the case, but I've dealt with too many creationists and crackpots over the years to assume this anymore.

[joeman]

If you are correct then this would clearly be a very serious situation. Therefore it is your responsibility to convince the public at large and the membership here of the truth of your assertions. With that in mind please address each of these points.

 

1. If the Earth's orbit has been destabilised and the axis has changed by 26 degreees, why has this not been noticed by anyone?

 

2. By what mechanism does the weakening of the magnetic field - soemthing that has happened many times in Earth history - destabilise the Earth's orbit.

 

3. By what mechanism does a change in axial rotation rate induce a change in orbit?

 

4. What evidence do you have that the sun is getting nearer? If it is, why does the moon still manage to block out the sun during a solar eclipse?

 

5. Oil and natural gas are not formed in the core? What makes you think they are?

 

(1). it has been notice by many people, sir. The earth magnetic field weakening by 10%, the earth developing a breach in its magnetic field, the earth magnetic field reversing at 40 miles per year, etc has been notice by others. I been in involved with global warming since July-1983, and I been say that the earth's orbit around the sun is decaying, and/or destabilizing for 29 year, I use these anomalies to prove my point.

 

 

 

 

(2). The weakening of earth's magnetic field is not a historical event. The earth magnetic field is generated by earth core. The high temperature in earth's core is sustained hydrocarbons e.g crude oil, and natural gas. The pathways of an oil, and gas well (earth fuel system) expands from the upper crust to the lower mantle, and the path of a volcano expands from the lower mantle to the the surface of earth. The core is not receiving the oil, and natural gas it once did, due to the oil, and natural gas extraction process used by the oil companies.. As a result the core is cooling, as the core cools the earth magnetic field weakens. The high temperature in the core is not supported by a nuclear geodynamo process. There is no nuclear materials strong enough to generates the high temperatures in the outer core only extremely lower levels of benign radioactive materials are discharged for volcanoes. High levels of hydrocarbon by-product are discharge, and large quantities of hydrocarbons are being combusted in the lower mantle, and outer core.

 

 

Geochemistry: Hot heads and cold tails

Nicholas Arndt Nature 407, 458-461(28 September 2000) doi:10.1038/35035176

 

 

The principal components of volcanic gases are hydro carbon by-product.

 

water vapor (H₂O), carbon

dioxide (CO₂), sulfur either as sulfur

dioxide (SO₂)

(high-temperature volcanic gases) or hydrogen

sulfide (H₂S)

(low-temperature volcanic gases), nitrogen, argon, helium, neon, methane, carbon

monoxide and hydrogen. Other compounds detected in volcanic gases are oxygen (meteoric), hydrogen

chloride, hydrogen

fluoride,hydrogen

bromide, nitrogen

oxide (NO_x), sulfur hexafluoride, carbonyl

sulfide, and organic

compounds. Exotic trace compounds includemethylmercury, halocarbons (including CFCs), and halogen oxide radicals.

The materials, and gases ejected from volcanoes suggest that large qualities of hydrocarbons (O&G) are being ignited in the lower mantle. Its the high temperatures, and high pressures, and earth's rotation that plays a role in generating earth's

magnetic field. If you disagree with this blog explain to me what the purpose for petroleum (O&G).

 

 

 

(3). The additional 26 degree shift in earth's axis is effecting the seasons. the winter here in Houston, Texas is sunny, and warmer, 50 years ago it was bitterly cold, and its altering the chandler's wobble, and Its the reason the earth magnetic field is moving, or reversing 40 miles per year.

 

http://science.nasa.gov/science-news/science-at-nasa/2003/29dec_magneticfield/

 

 

Merrill, Ronald T.; McElhinny, Michael W.; McFadden, Phillip L. (1996). "Chapter 8". The magnetic field of the earth: paleomagnetism, the core, and the deep mantle. Academic Press. ISBN 978-0-12-491246-5.

 

World Data Center for Geomagnetism, Kyoto. "Magnetic North, Geomagnetic and Magnetic Poles". Retrieved 2012-07-03.

North Magnetic Pole Moving East Due to Core Flux, National Geographic, December 24, 2009

 

 

 

 

(4). What evidence do you have that the sun is getting nearer? If it is,why does the moon still manage to block out the sun during a solar

eclipse?

 

REPLY: either the sun is growing in intensity, or the earth is slowly moving towards it. Due all calculations involving Greenhouse gas the actual temperature was never measured.

 

The atmospheric greenhouse effect, an idea that many authors trace back to the

traditional works of Fourier (1824), Tyndall (1861), and Arrhenius (1896), and which

is still supported in global climatology, essentially describes a fictitious mechanism, in

which a planetary atmosphere acts as a heat pump driven by an environment that is

radiatively interacting with but radiatively equilibrate to the atmospheric system. Ac-

cording to the second law of thermodynamics such a planetary machine can never exist.

Nevertheless, in almost all texts of global climatology and in a widespread secondary

literature it is taken for granted that such mechanism is real and stands on a rm sci-

entifc foundation. In this paper the popular conjecture is analyzed and the underlying

physical principles are clarified. By showing that (a) there are no common physical laws

between the warming phenomenon in glass houses and the fictitious atmospheric green-

house effects, (b) there are no calculations to determine an average surface temperature

of a planet, © the frequently mentioned difference of 33 C is a meaningless number

calculated wrongly, (d) the formulas of cavity radiation are used inappropriately, (e) the

assumption of a radiative balance is unphysical, (f) thermal conductivity and friction

must not be set to zero, the atmospheric greenhouse conjecture is falsified.

Electronic version of an article published as International Journal of Modern Physics

B, Vol. 23, No. 3 (2009) 275{364 , DOI No: 10.1142/S021797920904984X, c World

Scientific Publishing Company,

http://www.worldscinet.com/ijmpb.

 

 

 

Naomi Oreskes and Erik M. Conway (2010). Merchants of Doubt, Bloomsbury Press, pp. 8-9.

 

 

Proceedings of theInternational Astronomical Union / Volume 2004 /Issue IAUS223 / June 2004, pp 605-606

 

Active Cavity Radiometer Irradiance Monitor (ACRIM) solar irradiance monitoring 1978 to present (Satellite observations of total solar irradiance); access date 2012-02-03

 

Ineson S., Scaife A.A., Knight J.R., Manners J.C., Dunstone N.J., Gray L.J., Haigh J.D. (9 October 2011). "Solar forcing of winter climate variability in the Northern Hemisphere". Nature Geoscience 4 (11): 753–7. Bibcode 2011NatGe...4..753I. doi:10.1038/ngeo1282

 

 

"Russian academicsays CO2 not to blame for global warming". Russian InternationalNews Agency. 15 January 2007.

Retrieved 24 August 2012. "Global warming results not from the emission of greenhouse gases [...], but from an unusually

high level of solar radiation and [...] growth in its intensity."

 

 

(5). Oil and natural gas are not formed in the core? What makes you think they are?

 

REPLY: I never say that sir. I said hydrocarbon are being ignited in the lower mantle. The lower mantle heats the outer core, and the outer core heats the inner core, and the inner core generates the earth's magnetic field. The rotation of the planet also play a role in sustaining the molten activity in the outer core. Keep in mind one of the components of hydrocarbon, and its by-product is oxygen, so the ignition of hydrocarbons are possible in the lower mantle. Volcanic discharges suggest large quantities of hydrocarbons by-product are being ignited in the lower mantle.

 

Geochemistry: Hot heads and cold tails

Nicholas Arndt Nature 407, 458-461(28 September 2000) doi:10.1038/35035176

 

The principal components of volcanic gases are water

vapor (H₂O), carbon

dioxide (CO₂), sulfur either as sulfur

dioxide (SO₂)

(high-temperature volcanic gases) or hydrogen

sulfide (H₂S)

(low-temperature volcanic gases), nitrogen, argon, helium, neon, methane, carbon

monoxide and hydrogen. Other compounds detected in volcanic gases are oxygen (meteoric), hydrogen

chloride, hydrogen

fluoride,hydrogen

bromide, nitrogen

oxide (NO_x), sulfur hexafluoride, carbonyl

sulfide, and organic

compounds. Exotic trace compounds includemethylmercury, halocarbons (including CFCs), and halogen oxide radicals.

 

ROFLMAO

 

Seriously, there can be indirect evidence but not direct evidence of something that is naked-eye observable? Are you effing kidding me?

Okay here's the direct evidence. The 26 degree shift in earth's axis coincides with the earth's magnetic field moving at 40 miles per year.

http://science.nasa.gov/science-news/science-at-nasa/2003/29dec_magneticfield/

 

You can observe with the naked eye that he is most probably kidding you.

Okay here's the direct evidence. The 26 degree shift in earth's axis coincides with the earth's magnetic field moving at 40 miles per year.

http://science.nasa.gov/science-news/science-at-nasa/2003/29dec_magneticfield/

[pwagen]

(1). it has been notice by many people, sir. The earth magnetic field weakening by 10%, the earth developing a breach in its magnetic field, the earth magnetic field reversing at 40 miles per year, etc has been notice by others.

 

http://science.nasa.gov/science-news/science-at-nasa/2003/29dec_magneticfield/

You say the magnetic north pole is moving at 40 miles per year. Yet, the link you seem to be using as source says it's moving at 40 km per year.

 

Don't take this the wrong way, but if you manage to make such a mistake, perhaps you should look over your work a little more, because there's a high probability it isn't the only mistake you made.

[joeman]

I'm not getting it though. The title says global warming is a conspiracy or fake, yet the destabilizing of Earth's orbit would provide yet more evidence that the sun can heat it up more. Anyway, Earth's orbit has made gradual changes for the last 4-5 billion years, why would it all of a sudden become unstable? The rate that Earth's rotation slows down or destabilizes is so insignificantly small we won't have to change our calenders for it for at least 1000 years, and that's something that more than just climatologists looked at, studies like astronomy and even the business realm could be interested in that.

 

These conditions are accelerating. The destabilization of the earth's orbit is caused by the core of the earth cooling, and this due to the decrease in hydrocarbon flowing into the lower mantle. The flow of hydrocarbons, and the rotation of the earth is the main components of earth molten activity in it outer core. The outer core heats the inner core, and the inner core generates earth magnetic field.

 

You say the magnetic north pole is moving at 40 miles per year. Yet, the link you seem to be using as source says it's moving at 40 km per year.

 

Don't take this the wrong way, but if you manage to make such a mistake, perhaps you should look over your work a little more, because there's a high probability it isn't the only mistake you made.

I thank you for the correction. My point is that earth magnetic field is moving, and it coincide with the additional 26 degree shift in the earth's axis. Try to focus on the important points. Don't take this the wrong way, but people will have more respect for you, and take you more seriously, if you don't major in the minor, sir.

 

I want to be generous and assume this is the case, but I've dealt with too many creationists and crackpots over the years to assume this anymore.

Which, part of my scientific evidence you disagree with? If you say all of it, than I'm not the joker here.

[pwagen]

I thank you for the correction. My point is that earth magnetic field is moving, and it coincide with the additional 26 degree shift in the earth's axis. Try to focus on the important points. Don't take this the wrong way, but people will have more respect for you, and take you more seriously, if you don't major in the minor, sir.

But it's not really a minor point. You said that the movement at 40 miles per correlates with the 26 degrees shift of the axis. But the actual figure of 40 km per year is only about 25 miles. Accumulating over a few years, this isn't a marginal error. And I doubt both figures of 40 km and 40 miles correlates to your 26 degrees. So which is it?

[joeman]

Yeah I've also noticed winters getting warmer in the northern hemisphere

 

 

. Climatologists have been saying that for years, but they haven't said much about the Earth's axis.

Its because they believe greenhouse gases is the caused for global warming. They are set in their ways.

 

I'm not getting it though. The title says global warming is a conspiracy or fake, yet the destabilizing of Earth's orbit would provide yet more evidence that the sun can heat it up more. Anyway, Earth's orbit has made gradual changes for the last 4-5 billion years, why would it all of a sudden become unstable? The rate that Earth's rotation slows down or destabilizes is so insignificantly small we won't have to change our calenders for it for at least 1000 years, and that's something that more than just climatologists looked at, studies like astronomy and even the business realm could be interested in that.

This is a battle for the lives of everyone on this planet. One side is saying global warming is caused by greenhouse gases, and the other side is saying global warming is caused by the earth's orbit around the sun destabilizing. One thing you better understand if I lose everyone loses in the future.

 

All of the anomalies I outline are insignificant, but together they form a pattern of orbital destabilization. These anomalies are in the beginning stages, but they will get slowly, and progressively worse.

 

I don't know why people talk to me as if global warming is suppose to end all life on this planet over night. It will be a slow, and gradual process, thank goodness.

[swansont]

Okay here's the direct evidence. The 26 degree shift in earth's axis coincides with the earth's magnetic field moving at 40 miles per year.

http://science.nasa.gov/science-news/science-at-nasa/2003/29dec_magneticfield/

 

Magnetic north pole and rotational axis are two very, very, very, very, very, very different things. "axis" is not mentioned in that article. Not once.

[joeman]

But it's not really a minor point. You said that the movement at 40 miles per correlates with the 26 degrees shift of the axis. But the actual figure of 40 km per year is only about 25 miles. Accumulating over a few years, this isn't a marginal error. And I doubt both figures of 40 km and 40 miles correlates to your 26 degrees. So which is it?

NASA discovered this anomaly, they report the earth magnetic field is reversing at 40 km per year. If you focus on my point that the earth magnetic field is moving 40 km per year, you would had realize everything else is in consequential.

 

Wiith all due respect pointing out a difference of a few miles in this instance is a waste of my time, sir. This is the equivalent of child's play.

 

 

Magnetic north pole and rotational axis are two very, very, very, very, very, very different things. "axis" is not mentioned in that article. Not once.

 

Magnetic north pole and rotational axis are two very, very, very, very,

very, very different things.

 

REPLY: I'm aware of this, and your point is?

 

 

"axis" is not mentioned in that article.Not once.

 

REPLY: No the article doesn't directly mention the 26 degree shift, but I believe that the earth magnetic field moves as the earth's axis moves. And the chandler's wobble has moved from 1909 thru 2001 as a result of the axis moving. i believe these anomaly are indicators of the additional 26 degree shift in Earth's axis. This is all the scientific evidence I have for how. Even if you reject this evidence you certainly can't deny the other anomalies I point out.

 

 

(A). http://divulgence.net/axis%20shift%202.html

 

 

(B). http://www.columbia.edu/itc/ldeo/v1011x-1/jcm/Topic2/Topic2.html. See Topic: 2.3 polar motion 19091-2001:

 

©. http://www.technologyreview.com/view/415093/earths-chandler-wobble-changed-dramatically-in-2005/

 

(D). http://www.nasa.gov/vision/earth/lookingatearth/29dec_magneticfield.html

Edited February 22, 2013 by CaptainPanic
Normal font size is big enough for everyone. And there is no need to make everything bold.

[pwagen]

NASA discovered this anomaly, they report the earth magnetic field is reversing at 40 km per year. If you focus on my point that the earth magnetic field is moving 40 km per year, you would had realize everything else is in consequential.

 

Wiith all due respect pointing out a difference of a few miles in this instance is a waste of my time, sir. This is the equivalent of child's play.

The difference isn't "a few miles". It actually adds up to about 1745 km (1084.3 miles). That's a 15 degree difference, which is huge compared to your original 26 degrees. And to be frank, the numbers don't add up to 26 degrees anywhere. At all. If this is "child's play", it should be easy to answer, so please do.

[iNow]

On another note, I've always found that the most credible science is communicated using massive, multi-colored, and arbitrarily changing fonts.