Jump to content

New force carrying particle for new fundamental force of nature?


Recommended Posts

Posted

Not a terribly good article, I'm afraid. Unparticles are not part of the standard model they are part of an add-on to it, so saying that they are predicted is pretty meaningless — they are a prediction of a conjecture, which you can't assume is true. And the experiment didn't find them, so any discussion of effects is pure conjecture. What the experiment appears to have done is limit the scope of their interaction. IOW, it went in the direction of ruling them out.

 

It's a pretty enthusiastic tone for an experiment that found nothing.

Posted (edited)

Not a terribly good article, I'm afraid. Unparticles are not part of the standard model they are part of an add-on to it, so saying that they are predicted is pretty meaningless — they are a prediction of a conjecture, which you can't assume is true. And the experiment didn't find them, so any discussion of effects is pure conjecture. What the experiment appears to have done is limit the scope of their interaction. IOW, it went in the direction of ruling them out.

 

It's a pretty enthusiastic tone for an experiment that found nothing.

 

Reading ajb's Blog article and the previous post link on unparticles, I feel a need for an asprin and an explanation in clear English.

 

What with unparticles, virtual photons, and spin-spin that is not really spin and other vaporous things ,all happening miles away deep in the earth, I can't quite get my mind round it , without getting a headache.

 

Any chance of one of your clear type explanations ?

 

.

Edited by Mike Smith Cosmos
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.