Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

What do you know of Gneiss, schists, chert, erosion and sediment , by your profile I thought you were an atomic submarine optical specialist/expert , not a Geologist

 

Whats going on here , everyone's suddenly become an Earth Science enthusiast !

 

 

He has quite the conglomerate of knowledge, it quite comendite-able.

Posted (edited)

I am the very model of a modern major general.

 

Good night Gilbert o suliven , I miss read you all along. You really are multi-disciplined

 

He has quite the conglomerate of knowledge, it quite comendite-able.

 

Not another one, I get the feeling ,there is a ganging up ,going on. There I was trying to be serious having made a study this Wednesday, then made a painting that day, with my tongue in cheek, about real serious Omani Ophiolite , Imatfaal has a much better picture at his fingertips , and the real Ophiolite is no where to be seen, and I am taking the flack !

Edited by Mike Smith Cosmos
Posted

Good night Gilbert o suliven , I miss read you all along. You really are multi-disciplined

 

 

Not another one, I get the feeling ,there is a ganging up ,going on. There I was trying to be serious having made a study this Wednesday, then made a painting that day, with my tongue in cheek, about real serious Omani Ophiolite , Imatfaal has a much better picture at his fingertips , and the real Ophiolite is no where to be seen, and I am taking the flack !

 

These days my relation with geology is purely plutonic; I was very interested as a younger man as I believed it was the only science where dropping acid was acceptable and when one got boulder one could write papers on measuring a dyke's cleavage. But then I realised the competition was too fierce - too many people out standing in their field.

Posted

A lawyer has to know what rocks look like - because rock/paper/scissors plays a much bigger role in the courtroom than most judges are willing to admit.

FTFY

 

 

On topic, I think we should sticky the original article. We have some amateur trolls and quacks that could learn from that. I love a good troll... it's the bad ones that annoy me.

Posted

What is the percentage of quacks on this forum ?

How many threads from quacks?

 

Speculations has over 3000 threads, and the trash can almost a tenth of that. So, even given some legitimate speculation that's not contrary to established science, undeleted spam, duplication, etc., I'd say a thousand quack threads — threads that agree/identify with the satire in the article — is a reasonable minimum estimate.

Posted (edited)

I would expect more than one/day.

 

--------------------

I just noticed there is no external info about SFN, not even a wiki article.

Edited by michel123456
Posted

I found thay your geological puns are a bit quakey. Theres too much on my plate to let people rock my mind with watered down sediments towards an unnamed quack that burst through the crust of modern science.

Posted

Where does 'status quo bias' enter into this?

 

Generally it's taken for granite that the statues quo are founded on bedrock.

 

1130a. When thou sayest, "statues", in respect to these stones,

1130b. which are like fledglings of swallows under the river-bank;

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.