Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

So im in graph theory at my college and i have never done a single proof in my life. Normally the teacher gives us an option of either a proof or a program sense this class is also required for math majors. This time around however he decided to give every one one proof and one program and as far as the proof goes i am 100% lost.

The question goes as follows:

Corollary 3.2.24: Every binary tree of height h has at most 2^(k+1)-1 vertices.

Prove corollary 3.2.24 directly with the "strong form" of induction using its weaker induction: For some h>0 and all k<=h-1, a binary tree of height k has at most 2^(k+1)-1 vertices.

I'm not looking for a direct answer but any help to point me in the right direction would be much appreciated.

 

I know that a binary tree with 2 vertices will have a hieght of 1, then plugging in 1 into 2^(1+1)-1 which will = 3 stating that a tree with height 1 will have at most three vertices sense a vertex may only have two children in a binary tree. The tree will look like this:

 

0

/ \

0 0

The height of this tree is still only one and the largest amount of possible vertices with out increasing the height is 3.

Edited by Sorthon

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.